Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: drewc <drewc@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 18:06:22 GMT
Paolo Amoroso wrote:
drewc <drewc@xxxxxxxx> writes:
72000 + hits from that slashdot article on a cliki using a serve-event listener on a UML instance with 128mb RAM, and it stayed solid... Lisp is "practical" indeed :)
You may post this comment to Slashdot's PCL thread.
I did, of course, but the genius that is slashdot's moderation has kept me well below the radar of anybody who cares. :)
drewc
-- Drew Crampsie drewc at tech dot coop "Never mind the bollocks -- here's the sexp's tools." -- Karl A. Krueger on comp.lang.lisp .
- References:
- Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Peter Seibel
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Paolo Amoroso
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Peter Seibel
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Peter Wright
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Frank Buss
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: drewc
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Paolo Amoroso
- Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- Prev by Date: Re: Stack overflow problem
- Next by Date: Re: Comparing Lisp conditions to Java Exceptions
- Previous by thread: Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- Next by thread: Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|