Re: Code analysis, call graphs for Common Lisp
- From: David Trudgett <wpower@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 19:01:34 +1000
Raymond Toy <raymond.toy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
> CMUCL includes an xref feature. This will produce a call graph, and
> since it's in the compiler it should handle macros and such just fine.
> It's described in the User manual.
Thanks, Ray, it looks like it might come in handy. One possible
problem is that it takes into account compiler optimisations that
eliminate code. I suppose turning off the compiler optimisations might
help in that case. Also, it would be nice if it had a recursive
"what-does-it-call?" function in addition to the "who-calls" function!
A couple of other posters have mentioned possibilities that might
work, and hopefully with more portability.
David
--
David Trudgett
http://www.zeta.org.au/~wpower/
It's sociologically interesting, though scary, that you can be inside
an evil system and be somehow unaware of it.
-- Actor Anthony Sher on growing up in apartheid-South Africa,
interviewed by John Walsh, The Independent, 1 May, 2000
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Code analysis, call graphs for Common Lisp
- Next by Date: logical pathname translations
- Previous by thread: Re: Code analysis, call graphs for Common Lisp
- Next by thread: Re: Code analysis, call graphs for Common Lisp
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|