Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Morten Alver <morten@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 09:45:03 +0200
Paolo Amoroso wrote:
> Morten Alver <morten@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>Before this, I never tried Lisp, but this /. article perked my interest.
>>Now I've started learning it, and even ordered the book. I'm very
>>impressed with this language - I've been (and still am) a Java advocate,
>>but I really didn't have a clue what I was missing.
>
> When you are done or almost done with the book, and you feel
> sufficiently comfortable with the material, it will be interesting to
> know your opinion on Lisp, e.g. whether you will still be impressed,
> or maybe disappointed.
Yes, it happens sometimes that a good first impression fades when you
look closer into things. Maybe I'll post some further impressions after
a while.
--
Morten
.
- References:
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Morten Alver
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- From: Paolo Amoroso
- Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- Prev by Date: Changing source on the fly (Was: Lisp Book(s) in the K&R Style)
- Next by Date: Re: Wondering if you guys would like to comment on this
- Previous by thread: Re: Practical Common Lisp reviewed on /.
- Next by thread: Re: Lisp/Unix impedance [a programming challenge]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|