Re: Macros and symbols across packages
- From: Edi Weitz <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 18:37:37 +0200
[Please quote some context when replying.]
On 29 May 2005 06:49:14 -0700, "Jeff M." <massung@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> However, I just tried your loop example with LW 4.4, and it works
> only if foo::for isn't defined as a function.
Really? I can't reproduce that with LWW 4.4.5. Do you have an
example?
Cheers,
Edi.
--
Lisp is not dead, it just smells funny.
Real email: (replace (subseq "spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx" 5) "edi")
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Macros and symbols across packages
- From: Jeff M.
- Re: Macros and symbols across packages
- References:
- Macros and symbols across packages
- From: Jeff M.
- Re: Macros and symbols across packages
- From: Edi Weitz
- Re: Macros and symbols across packages
- From: Jeff M.
- Macros and symbols across packages
- Prev by Date: Re: simple testcase to dissect
- Next by Date: Re: MOP/Macroexpansion
- Previous by thread: Re: Macros and symbols across packages
- Next by thread: Re: Macros and symbols across packages
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|