Re: Has Rational Rose a Lisp history?
- From: Pascal Bourguignon <pjb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 21:55:58 +0200
Christian Lynbech <christian@xxxxxxxx> writes:
> I stumbled across some files produced by Rational Rose, a modelling
> tool that dabbles in things such as UML diagrams and surprisingly
> enough it had an SEXP format.
>
> A description of the format can be found here
>
> http://crazybeans.sourceforge.net/CrazyBeans/doc/grammar.pdf
>
> Given the rest of the world's attitude towards parenthesises, it
> almost cannot be an accident.
>
> Does anybody know if Rational Rose has any kind of Lisp heritage?
Not that I know. Sexps come back to the OMTool (from Martin Marietta,
Inc.) more than 15 years ago. IIRC, it was not written in lisp but
in Smalltalk. Rumbaugh then came to Rational. The sexprs were only
used as an internal data format.
The point is that it's a damn good idea to use sexprs, a "competitive
advantage".
Also you can see it as Greenspun Tenth Law in action...
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
This is a signature virus. Add me to your signature and help me to live
.
- References:
- Has Rational Rose a Lisp history?
- From: Christian Lynbech
- Has Rational Rose a Lisp history?
- Prev by Date: Re: capi/cocoa capturing
- Next by Date: Re: Overlord programs
- Previous by thread: Has Rational Rose a Lisp history?
- Next by thread: Any Pointers?
- Index(es):