Re: LISP for web
- From: Edi Weitz <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2005 12:09:09 +0200
On 8 Jun 2005 02:58:09 -0700, "Damir" <damir@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I'd realy like to know about these alternatives.
>
> The thing is, I'm not expirienced lisp user. I just need to do this
> web app. I'm used to Apache, Pgsql, mod_perl and template toolkit. I
> know if I use this setup, although I know it well, I won't have the
> edge I need to compeete.
>
> That's why I'm here in the first place. I want to get as much
> options as I can, before I start hammering with perl.
I also came from Apache/mod_perl/SQL and it's kind of hard to get rid
of this... :)
Unfortunately, there's no easy and perfect way to find a solution
that's better for you - it depends on your problem domain and your
preferences. I'm afraid you'll have to play around with a couple of
alternatives and see for yourself (and come back here with specific
questions if needed). Really, install stuff and try it, it doesn't
suffice to just skim a few documentation pages.
Things you could/should try:
1. BKNR <http://bknr.net/>
That's a complete framework for websites including persistent
storage, and it comes with good documentation. No Apache or SQL
involved... :)
2. Look at Lisp-y databases like Plob! or Elephant.
<http://plob.sf.net/>
<http://common-lisp.net/project/elephant/>
3. Checkout CLSQL's object-oriented layer atop SQL.
Search CLiki for more.
HTH,
Edi.
--
Lisp is not dead, it just smells funny.
Real email: (replace (subseq "spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx" 5) "edi")
.
- References:
- LISP for web
- From: Damir
- Re: LISP for web
- From: Marco Baringer
- Re: LISP for web
- From: Damir
- Re: LISP for web
- From: Edi Weitz
- Re: LISP for web
- From: Damir
- LISP for web
- Prev by Date: Re: LISP for web
- Next by Date: Re: Alternatives to OO?
- Previous by thread: Re: LISP for web
- Next by thread: Re: LISP for web
- Index(es):
Loading