Re: LISP for web
- From: "Marco Baringer" <mb@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 19:49:06 +0200
Frank Goenninger DG1SBG <frank_goenninger@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> "Marco Baringer" <mb@xxxxxxx> writes:
>
> [snippedy-snip]
>
>> 2) high availablity. can you create a ucw app which is resistent to
>> hardware failures? not currently. the load-balancing solution in
>> (1.b) can deal with hardware failures an the app servers but this
>> leaves the db as a spof. the only 'real' solutions to this is to
>> use a db which supports replication and store sessions in the db.
>
> That's just one solution. Using other High Availability solutions like
> failover mechanisms (stable solutions available for all commercial
> unixes and also even for Linux) do provide this also, and work in many
> setups I have done also as 'real' solutions.
>
> Need more input? Ask!
i'm asking :)
--
-Marco
Ring the bells that still can ring.
Forget the perfect offering.
There is a crack in everything.
That's how the light gets in.
-Leonard Cohen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: LISP for web
- From: Frank Goenninger DG1SBG
- Re: LISP for web
- References:
- LISP for web
- From: Damir
- Re: LISP for web
- From: drewc
- Re: LISP for web
- From: R. Mattes
- Re: LISP for web
- From: Marco Baringer
- Re: LISP for web
- From: Peter Scott
- Re: LISP for web
- From: Marco Baringer
- Re: LISP for web
- From: Marco Baringer
- Re: LISP for web
- From: Brad Anderson
- Re: LISP for web
- From: Marco Baringer
- Re: LISP for web
- From: Frank Goenninger DG1SBG
- LISP for web
- Prev by Date: Maphash into a new hashtable
- Next by Date: Re: Maphash into a new hashtable
- Previous by thread: Re: LISP for web
- Next by thread: Re: LISP for web
- Index(es):