Re: SBCL funcallable-standard-class confusion
- From: Christophe Rhodes <csr21@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 07:05:38 +0100
jtdubs@xxxxxxxxx writes:
> Anyway, the original question remains as to why this doesn't work with
> lambda.
Briefly: because the calling convention for
funcallable-standard-instances in the version of
PCL-the-CLOS-implementation present in SBCL is different from the
calling convention for normal functions. As far as I'm concerned,
this is a bug.
Cheers,
Christophe
.
- References:
- SBCL funcallable-standard-class confusion
- From: jtdubs
- Re: SBCL funcallable-standard-class confusion
- From: jtdubs
- SBCL funcallable-standard-class confusion
- Prev by Date: Re: Screenshots of real-world Lisp apps
- Next by Date: Re: ILC2005: McCarthy denounces Common Lisp, "Lisp", XML, and Rahul
- Previous by thread: Re: SBCL funcallable-standard-class confusion
- Index(es):