Re: Request for comment: follow-up to Summer of Code



matthewknox@xxxxxxxxx writes:

>your problem and less about the machine. The lisp family of languages
>is unique in the degree to which it allows you to be both close to the
>machine and close to pure thought-stuff in the same language, sometimes
>even in the same program.

Please explain to me in what way Common Lisp is "close to the machine".

mkb.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Common Lisp from a Unix perspective - barriers to using CL
    ... This is quite a strange situation: some important facilities ... that Common Lisp does *not* include built-in, ... Most modern programming languages ... Because the world nowadays uses strings, ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Paul Grahams Arc is released today... what is the long term impact?
    ... not mistaken Common Lisp was just a mash-up of many other lisps. ... was to combine the two languages. ... disagree with a lot about Arc, but to me it's Common Lisp 2, because ... What matters are concepts like functional programming, not concrete functional programming languages; object-oriented programming, not concrete object-oriented programming languages; imperative programming, not concrete imperative programming languages; programmable programming languages, not concrete programmable programming languages. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: whats it worth to write a short program for polynomial multiplication?
    ... Common Lisp Object System ... The idiom is called a double dispatch pattern. ... languages, when you invoke a method ("send a message" in Smalltalk, ... It is pretty handy for programming, though, and I think ...
    (sci.math.symbolic)
  • Re: lisp revised standard
    ... Whether or not CL is one language or a family of languages is a purely artificial distinction. ... You simply cannot compare Common Lisp to, say, Python. ... You can compare Common Lisp to the family of languages that consists of Python, JPython, Stackless Python, IronPython, etc. pp. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: F#
    ... you don't need to trade flexibility for performance. ... This is what Common Lisp allows you. ... give you a good platform for dynamic languages. ... The output of the Caml compiler ...
    (comp.lang.functional)