FFI licensing [Was: Hello-C mailing list?]
- From: Kevin Rosenberg <kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 18:12:05 +0000 (UTC)
On 2005-06-29, Kenny Tilton <ktilton@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> [...]
> Who knows where this will end up? All projects have friendly licenses
> and are free to borrow from each other. Hello-C by name may cease to
> exist or may end up with its own project. Meanwhile the CFFI developer
> has responded positively to Hello-C extending his work, so the source
> will be in a branch of the CFFI CVS tree for now.
>
> Hope that is not too confusing. :)
Well, sorry to add to the confusion, but the licensing issue is not
clear, and that is my fault. I originally licensed UFFI under Franz's
Lesser Lisp GPL (LLGPL). However, I subsequently changed the license
to the more liberal BSD license. I updated the LICENSE file with this
information, but neglected to update license header in the individual
source files. I will rectify this discordance.
My inclination is complete the intended transition by change the
license test in the source files to a BSD license. However, that would
prevent UFFI from participating in the "borrowing" process you
mentioned. How would you feel about following the transition to a BSD
license for your UFFI fork?
PS Congratulations on the funding for lispnyc's summer of code
--
Kevin Rosenberg
kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FFI licensing [Was: Hello-C mailing list?]
- From: Kenny Tilton
- Re: FFI licensing [Was: Hello-C mailing list?]
- References:
- Re: Hello-C mailing list?
- From: Marco Baringer
- Re: Hello-C mailing list?
- From: Juanjo
- Re: Hello-C mailing list?
- From: Kenny Tilton
- Re: Hello-C mailing list?
- Prev by Date: Re: ILC2005: McCarthy denounces Common Lisp, "Lisp", XML, and Rahul
- Next by Date: Re: ILC2005: McCarthy denounces Common Lisp, "Lisp", XML, and Rahul
- Previous by thread: Re: Hello-C mailing list?
- Next by thread: Re: FFI licensing [Was: Hello-C mailing list?]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|