Re: been reading WSJ?
- From: GP lisper <spambait@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jul 2005 23:54:05 -0700
On Tue, 05 Jul 2005 21:11:14 -0700, <hello@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> In http://www.paulgraham.com/bronze.html , Paul Graham writes:
>
> "Reading the Wall Street Journal for a week should give anyone ideas for two
> or three new startups. The articles are full of descriptions of problems
> that need to be solved. But most of the applicants don't seem to have
> looked far for ideas."
>
> I'm curious if anyone has followed this advice and actually read WSJ for a
> week or more looking for ideas?
You can get a free subscription to WSJ for a couple of weeks just by
signing up. I've read it for years, off and on, and would say 'sure
there are ideas present'. There is always a surplus of ideas around,
and they are very cheap. Funding is another story, very much like
Catch-22. The notices in the back are the most commonly read actually.
--
The LOOP construct is really neat, it's got a lot of knobs to turn!
Don't push the yellow one on the bottom.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: been reading WSJ?
- From: Gorbag
- Re: been reading WSJ?
- References:
- been reading WSJ?
- From: alex goldman
- been reading WSJ?
- Prev by Date: Re: Audit code request: clisp ffi interface to tcl/tk
- Next by Date: Re: ILC2005: McCarthy denounces Common Lisp, "Lisp", XML, and Rahul
- Previous by thread: Re: been reading WSJ?
- Next by thread: Re: been reading WSJ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
