Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Raffael Cavallaro <raffaelcavallaro@pas-d'espam-s'il-vous-plait-mac.com>
- Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 21:01:32 -0400
On 2005-08-13 07:18:40 -0400, Jon Harrop <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
Here is Nathan Baum's port for CMUCL and SBCL:
just as an additional data point, this code runs in just over 6 seconds in sbcl 0.9.3 on a dual 2.0 GHz G5 (though sbcl only uses one processor).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: robert . thorpe
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Svenne Krap
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- References:
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- Prev by Date: Which Emacs on Mac OS X?
- Next by Date: Re: ECL 0.9g released
- Previous by thread: Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- Next by thread: Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- Index(es):
Loading
