Re: Very poor Lisp performance

Raffael Cavallaro wrote: 
On 2005-08-13 07:18:40 -0400, Jon Harrop <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:

Here is Nathan Baum's port for CMUCL and SBCL:


just as an additional data point, this code runs in just over 6 seconds in sbcl 0.9.3 on a dual 2.0 GHz G5 (though sbcl only uses one processor). 

On a single Xeon 3.4 GHz with sbcl 0.9.3:

Evaluation took:
  3.783 seconds of real time
  3.305498 seconds of user run time
  0.477927 seconds of system run time
  0 page faults and
  509,576,768 bytes consed
.

Loading