Re: Very poor Lisp performance


"Jamie Border" <jamie@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:ddsa0j$fk6$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Hartmann Schaffer" <hs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:WqfMe.1588$Dd.6727@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Jon Harrop wrote:
>>> ...
> JH>> However, LOC overly penalises Lisp and Scheme, IMHO. Specifically,
> Lisp and
> JH>> Scheme programs are virtually unreadable unless the parentheses are
> JH>> staggered by spreading expressions over several lines and using an
> JH>> automatic indenter. So if I were to put a Lisp implementation of the
> ray
> JH>> tracer on my site then I'd either state that, or I'd give results
> using
> JH>> some other measure of verbosity, like characters.
>
> Hmm. What would you (JH) be measuring here?
>
> a) Keystrokes required to produce the code (see below, though)
> b) Some kind of 'intrinsic verbosity', which would require some *serious*
> thinking about idiomaticity, relevance of formatting and massive, massive
> sampling to make it statistically relevant.
>
>
>> i doubt lisp or scheme will gain anything there: the language defined
>> words tend to be quite lengthy, and afaict that seems to encourage
>> programmers to use pretty length identifiers for their own identifiers,
>
> Yes
>
>> so character count might penalize lisp even worse. otoh, the lengthy
>> identifiers make lisp code quite easy to read and understand.
>
> Yes, and using a decent editor with auto-completion (Emacs) means that I
> hit less keys to produce the token 'DESTRUCTURING-BIND' ( DE-B
> <META-TAB> ) than you might think.
>
> Oh, and all the ')))))' you see probably didn't get typed by hand (
> <META-RET> closes all open parens).

^^^^^^^^^^^^ at least at the slime REPL anyway <oops>

>
>>
>> token count probably would be better
>
> Yep, although (because I am biased) I would like to see
> 'keystroke/mouse-click' count instead. I think that with the requirement
> for idiomatic variable naming, CL might not come out as 'verbose' as you
> think...
>
>>
>>> ...
>>
>> hs
>
>


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: So completely lost - trying to learn Lisp
    ... David Touretzky's book Common Lisp: ... Learn Scheme (a Lisp ... An Introduction to Computer Science Using ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Lisp Ruby Scheme
    ... The other side is that Lisp and Scheme: allow you to explore new programming styles for which there are no: dedicated languages available yet. ... with styles for which there is no dedicated language yet. ...
    (comp.lang.scheme)
  • Re: quote semantics
    ... with some useful work on Lisp libraries, if you fall that way GTF ... ask for that one, too, whether it was all that related to the Lambda ... And certainly CL took influence from Scheme, ... claim that this community, which is entirely composed of people who, ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Why Lisp instead of Scheme?
    ... > choose Scheme over Lisp). ... I follow this thread with interest since I'm new to both languages and ... to a particular Lisp or Scheme implementation seems like a non-trivial ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Why Lisp instead of Scheme?
    ... I am currently going up the Bigloo Scheme learning curve. ... graphics and game AI problems. ... I keep tabs on Lisp ... But the project I have in mind is substantial, and committing to ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)