Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Christophe Rhodes <csr21@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 17:54:02 +0100
Jon Harrop <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Jamie Border wrote:
>> Yep, although (because I am biased) I would like to see
>> 'keystroke/mouse-click' count instead. I think that with the requirement
>> for idiomatic variable naming, CL might not come out as 'verbose' as you
>> think...
>
> Is Lisp code not made less maintainable because of all those brackets?
No, it is made more maintainable because of all those brackets,
because it is straightforward to write tools which can manipulate the
textual representation of your program, and because human programmers
do not read the brackets.
Christophe
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Joe Marshall
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- References:
- Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: M Jared Finder
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Raffael Cavallaro
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Svenne Krap
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Ulrich Hobelmann
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Förster vom Silberwald
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Michael Sullivan
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Hartmann Schaffer
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jamie Border
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Very poor Lisp performance
- Prev by Date: Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- Next by Date: Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- Previous by thread: Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- Next by thread: Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- Index(es):