Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 16:28:58 +0100
Joe Marshall wrote:
> Infix parsers are rarely used for several reasons. The increase in
> incompatibility is one reason, but there are others:
>
> Infix macros are *hard*.
Do you mean it is difficult to implement infix in Lisp?
> You need to learn the prefix notation *anyway* (because code that
> operates on code needs to operate at the abstract syntax level,
> which in lisp is naturally prefix-notated lists).
So Lisp is rather tied to the built-in prefix notation.
> Infix only works well on binary operations
Yes.
> (consider the popularity of ternary ? : operator).
I used to use that a fair bit. Are you saying it is popular or unpopular?
> Languages drift. And as I mentioned before, bandwidth and error
> correction are importand factors.
Do you think that syntax is a significant source of errors when programming?
I believe that my errors tend to be at higher levels, e.g. algorithms.
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
http://www.ffconsultancy.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Joe Marshall
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Ulrich Hobelmann
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- References:
- Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: M Jared Finder
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Raffael Cavallaro
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Svenne Krap
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Ulrich Hobelmann
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Förster vom Silberwald
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Michael Sullivan
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Hartmann Schaffer
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jamie Border
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Christophe Rhodes
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Joe Marshall
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Tayssir John Gabbour
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Joe Marshall
- Very poor Lisp performance
- Prev by Date: Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- Next by Date: Re: learning lisp by doing
- Previous by thread: Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- Next by thread: Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|