Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jens Axel Søgaard <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 20:46:10 +0200
Jon Harrop wrote:
Brian Downing wrote:
However to understand the comparison you'll, of course, have to learn something about Common Lisp macros. And if you really want to go to town, look into Scheme's various macro systems which offer a slightly different take on the problem.
Can you give me a reference explaining the difference between Lisp and Scheme here? I didn't realise this existed...
The two keywords are "hygienic" and "referential transparency". See the introduction and papers on:
<http://schemecookbook.org/Cookbook/GettingStartedMacros>
Then if really want to know more, head over to:
<http://library.readscheme.org/page3.html>
-- Jens Axel Søgaard
.
- References:
- Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Ulrich Hobelmann
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Peter Seibel
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Brian Downing
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Very poor Lisp performance
- Prev by Date: Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- Next by Date: Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- Previous by thread: Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- Next by thread: Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- Index(es):