Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 19:16:10 +0100
jayessay wrote:
> Jon Harrop <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> > Your responses show that you do not understand the concept of Lisp
>> > macros. Your mention of "AST" (abstract syntax trees) and comparisons
>> > to Mathematica, for instance, are not on point.
>>
>> Several people have said this but none have explained why.
>
> Of course we have. You just haven't paid any attention to the
> answers. Little wonder you still don't have a clue.
Other people are now agreeing that Mathematica has similar capabilities.
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
http://www.ffconsultancy.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: jayessay
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- References:
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Svenne Krap
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Ulrich Hobelmann
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Förster vom Silberwald
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Michael Sullivan
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Hartmann Schaffer
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jamie Border
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Christophe Rhodes
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: André Thieme
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: jayessay
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- Prev by Date: Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- Next by Date: Re: Ray tracer in Stalin
- Previous by thread: Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- Next by thread: Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|