Re: Lisp/Unix impedance [a programming challenge]
- From: Bulent Murtezaoglu <bm@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2005 17:48:03 +0300
>>>>> "TX" == Tim X <Tim> writes:
[...]
TX> I'm actually a bit amazed you have a modem that is soooo old
TX> it only runs at 19k - they haven't even made modems that slow
TX> for nearly 20 years. I purchased a 24k modem in 1986 or 1987! [...]
For dial-up? I doubt it. Around that time, (for consumers) the best
available was 2400+MNP5 (9600bps with compression). Telebit had some
proprietary (called PEP or something I believe) scheme that went up to
14.4k bps or perhaps 19.2 (raw), but I don't know if it was available
in 87. Microcom (?) had stuff too but AFAIR theirs was not that fast.
Or could it be that I am getting senile?
cheers,
BM
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Re: Lisp/Unix impedance [a programming challenge]
- From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
- Re: Lisp/Unix impedance [a programming challenge]
- From: Matthias Buelow
- Re: Lisp/Unix impedance [a programming challenge]
- From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
- Re: Lisp/Unix impedance [a programming challenge]
- From: Tim X
- Re: Lisp/Unix impedance [a programming challenge]
- From: Robert Maas, see http://tinyurl.com/uh3t
- Re: Lisp/Unix impedance [a programming challenge]
- From: Tim X
- Re: Lisp/Unix impedance [a programming challenge]
- Prev by Date: Re: string interpolation (newbie)
- Next by Date: Re: Lisp syntax vs. Mathematica syntax
- Previous by thread: Re: Lisp/Unix impedance [a programming challenge]
- Next by thread: Re: Lisp/Unix impedance [a programming challenge]
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|