Re: Lisp's QUOTE and Mathematica's "Hold"
- From: Jon Harrop <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 16:37:07 +0100
Nathan Baum wrote:
> We see again that the comparison between Release/Hold and EVAL/QUOTE is
> ill-founded. It's like saying multiplication and addition are equivalent
> because 2 + 2 == 2 * 2.
Yes, you are quite right. My examples that produced the right answer did so
for the wrong reason. Oh well. So Lisp's eval and quote wouldn't be very
useful for writing a CAS. What do Lispers use eval and quote for then? :-)
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
http://www.ffconsultancy.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lisp's QUOTE and Mathematica's "Hold"
- From: Nathan Baum
- Re: Lisp's QUOTE and Mathematica's "Hold"
- From: Richard Fateman
- Re: Lisp's QUOTE and Mathematica's "Hold"
- References:
- Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Ulrich Hobelmann
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- From: Brian Downing
- Re: Lisp's QUOTE and Mathematica's "Hold"
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Lisp's QUOTE and Mathematica's "Hold"
- From: Nathan Baum
- Re: Lisp's QUOTE and Mathematica's "Hold"
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Lisp's QUOTE and Mathematica's "Hold"
- From: Nathan Baum
- Re: Lisp's QUOTE and Mathematica's "Hold"
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Lisp's QUOTE and Mathematica's "Hold"
- From: Nathan Baum
- Re: Lisp's QUOTE and Mathematica's "Hold"
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Lisp's QUOTE and Mathematica's "Hold"
- From: Nathan Baum
- Re: Lisp's QUOTE and Mathematica's "Hold"
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: Lisp's QUOTE and Mathematica's "Hold"
- From: Nathan Baum
- Very poor Lisp performance
- Prev by Date: Re: Lisp's QUOTE and Mathematica's "Hold"
- Next by Date: Re: Very poor Lisp performance
- Previous by thread: Re: Lisp's QUOTE and Mathematica's "Hold"
- Next by thread: Re: Lisp's QUOTE and Mathematica's "Hold"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|