Lisp object code versus that of other languages
- From: "jonathon" <j_mckitrick@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Aug 2005 15:30:59 -0700
I've recently gone from Lisp (back) to assembly language to do some
'fun' stuff I haven't done in a long time. I've been looking at a few
samples of Lisp object code (disassemble in sbcl) and found some pretty
cryptic code.
Is it true to say that Lisp produces more complex and/or cryptic code
than, say, C/C++ and other languages that can compile direct to ML?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lisp object code versus that of other languages
- From: Rob Thorpe
- Re: Lisp object code versus that of other languages
- From: Paolo Amoroso
- Re: Lisp object code versus that of other languages
- From: Juho Snellman
- Re: Lisp object code versus that of other languages
- From: Thomas F. Bur***
- Re: Lisp object code versus that of other languages
- From: Jeff M.
- Re: Lisp object code versus that of other languages
- Prev by Date: Re: Cost of starting a software business
- Next by Date: Re: Lisp object code versus that of other languages
- Previous by thread: ASDF: optimization settings and other enhancements
- Next by thread: Re: Lisp object code versus that of other languages
- Index(es):