Re: Lisp object code versus that of other languages
- From: Paolo Amoroso <amoroso@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 11:40:02 +0200
"jonathon" <j_mckitrick@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I've recently gone from Lisp (back) to assembly language to do some
> 'fun' stuff I haven't done in a long time. I've been looking at a few
> samples of Lisp object code (disassemble in sbcl) and found some pretty
> cryptic code.
Here is some information on CMUCL:
Reading disassembly output
http://www.cons.org/cmucl/doc/reading-disassembly.html
Paolo
--
Why Lisp? http://wiki.alu.org/RtL%20Highlight%20Film
Recommended Common Lisp libraries/tools:
- ASDF/ASDF-INSTALL: system building/installation
- CL-PPCRE: regular expressions
- UFFI: Foreign Function Interface
.
- References:
- Lisp object code versus that of other languages
- From: jonathon
- Lisp object code versus that of other languages
- Prev by Date: How to Easily Specify Export Symbol
- Next by Date: Re: Lisp object code versus that of other languages
- Previous by thread: Re: Lisp object code versus that of other languages
- Next by thread: Re: Lisp object code versus that of other languages
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|