Re: Lisp object code versus that of other languages
- From: "Rob Thorpe" <robert.thorpe@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 31 Aug 2005 04:37:10 -0700
jonathon wrote:
> I've recently gone from Lisp (back) to assembly language to do some
> 'fun' stuff I haven't done in a long time. I've been looking at a few
> samples of Lisp object code (disassemble in sbcl) and found some pretty
> cryptic code.
>
> Is it true to say that Lisp produces more complex and/or cryptic code
> than, say, C/C++ and other languages that can compile direct to ML?
If it's of interest to you, you can read the C output of GCL without
_too_ much difficulty.
.
- References:
- Lisp object code versus that of other languages
- From: jonathon
- Lisp object code versus that of other languages
- Prev by Date: Re: Lisp object code versus that of other languages
- Next by Date: Re: How to compile/link a multiple files with ECL
- Previous by thread: Re: Lisp object code versus that of other languages
- Next by thread: How to compile/link a multiple files with ECL
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
