Re: GC in Jon's raytracing benchmark
- From: Juho Snellman <jsnell@xxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Sep 2005 17:22:12 GMT
<usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> In this case, OCaml is using its AMD64 code gen. It'll be interesting to
> retime these when SBCL gets an AMD64 backend. :-)
That would about 9 months ago.
--
Juho Snellman
"Premature profiling is the root of all evil."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: GC in Jon's raytracing benchmark
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: GC in Jon's raytracing benchmark
- References:
- GC in Jon's raytracing benchmark
- From: Rob Thorpe
- Re: GC in Jon's raytracing benchmark
- From: Juho Snellman
- Re: GC in Jon's raytracing benchmark
- From: Rob Thorpe
- Re: GC in Jon's raytracing benchmark
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: GC in Jon's raytracing benchmark
- From: Juho Snellman
- Re: GC in Jon's raytracing benchmark
- From: Vesa Karvonen
- Re: GC in Jon's raytracing benchmark
- From: Rob Thorpe
- Re: GC in Jon's raytracing benchmark
- From: Juho Snellman
- Re: GC in Jon's raytracing benchmark
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: GC in Jon's raytracing benchmark
- From: Juho Snellman
- Re: GC in Jon's raytracing benchmark
- From: Jon Harrop
- GC in Jon's raytracing benchmark
- Prev by Date: Re: Building a framework in lisp for testing and feature documentation?
- Next by Date: Re: GC in Jon's raytracing benchmark
- Previous by thread: Re: GC in Jon's raytracing benchmark
- Next by thread: Re: GC in Jon's raytracing benchmark
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|