Re: Low level C interaction (Specifically OpenGL)
- From: "bradb" <brad.beveridge@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Sep 2005 15:36:27 -0700
Thanks a lot for that. Am I best to just macro up the (sys:sap-int
.....) call to something like (address-of points), and then make the
macro portable later?
I am a little concerned for portability - I generally try to write
fairly portable C code - should I try to write these kinds of things
using UFFI/CFFI, macro wrappers (my own portability layer), or not even
bother at all for now?
Thanks again - I'll probably have many more naive questions :)
Brad
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Low level C interaction (Specifically OpenGL)
- From: Brad Might
- Re: Low level C interaction (Specifically OpenGL)
- References:
- Low level C interaction (Specifically OpenGL)
- From: bradb
- Re: Low level C interaction (Specifically OpenGL)
- From: Brad Might
- Low level C interaction (Specifically OpenGL)
- Prev by Date: Re: What's so great about lisp?
- Next by Date: Re: What's so great about lisp?
- Previous by thread: Re: Low level C interaction (Specifically OpenGL)
- Next by thread: Re: Low level C interaction (Specifically OpenGL)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|