Re: lisp function questions

josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> In fact, after discussing Lisp-vs-OCaml for the last month, you have
> produced a Lisp function which is substantially WORSE than the apparent
> novice came up with. The original poster made some honest beginner's
> errors. I can't conceive of what twisted thinking would cause an
> intelligent, supposedly experienced functional programmer to come up
> with your example.

Brevity. ;-)

--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
http://www.ffconsultancy.com
.