Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: Joe Marshall <jmarshall@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2005 23:10:56 -0400
William Bland <doctorbill.news@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I frequently have programs in a state where much of the code is
> completely broken with respect to type-correctness, and I *know*
> that, but I still want to compile it so that I can work on the other
> bits.
Exactly.
Now I want as much static checking as possible, but I'm going to get
really irritated if it gets in the way.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: Kenny Tilton
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- References:
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: Joe Marshall
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: Joe Marshall
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: Lars Brinkhoff
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: Thomas F. Bur***
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: William Bland
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- Prev by Date: Re: What's so great about lisp?
- Next by Date: Re: Style questions
- Previous by thread: Re: What's so great about lisp?
- Next by thread: Re: What's so great about lisp?
- Index(es):