Re: Why Lisp is not popular with average programmers
- From: "Tayssir John Gabbour" <tayss_temp2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 8 Oct 2005 05:59:42 -0700
Pascal Costanza wrote:
> David Steuber wrote:
> >>1) no gui toolkit built into the language or standardized.
> >
> > That's true of virtually all programming languages. Java was the
> > first language I've seen to standardize on a GUI toolkit. So far it
> > is the only one, but I haven't gotten around that much.
>
> I also don't know whether Java is the first and/or the only language to
> standardize on a GUI. But note that even in the case of Java this is not
> a clear-cut thing. You can use AWT, Swing or SWT for desktops, and on
> Mac OS X you can also use the bindings to the native GUI library. It
> also depends on the specific IDE you use which of those alternatives is
> better or at all supported, so no real difference to Common Lisp here.
> And if you want to make sure that your programs also run on other
> devices, it becomes even more problematic.
It's an uphill battle to please everyone with GUIs.
People even slam Java Swing for being a horrible GUI. (I think pretty
undeservedly, as there exist things like JGoodies.) I once mentioned
Edi's Regex Coach on some forum, and believe it or not, there was still
some (anonymous) guy who criticized it for not being Windows-like
enough.
Of course, it's #1 on a Google search for "regex", and exactly how
Windows-like is Firefox, Winamp, Bittorrent, and other successful
software? I think the Regex Coach looks more Windowsy than those
examples.
Tayssir
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why Lisp is not popular with average programmers
- From: Edi Weitz
- Re: Why Lisp is not popular with average programmers
- References:
- Re: Why Lisp is not popular with average programmers
- From: Ray Dillinger
- Re: Why Lisp is not popular with average programmers
- From: Duane Rettig
- Re: Why Lisp is not popular with average programmers
- From: Ray Dillinger
- Re: Why Lisp is not popular with average programmers
- From: Bulent Murtezaoglu
- Re: Why Lisp is not popular with average programmers
- From: Ray Dillinger
- Re: Why Lisp is not popular with average programmers
- From: Christopher C. Stacy
- Re: Why Lisp is not popular with average programmers
- From: robbie.carlton@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why Lisp is not popular with average programmers
- From: Greg Menke
- Re: Why Lisp is not popular with average programmers
- From: Ray Dillinger
- Re: Why Lisp is not popular with average programmers
- From: josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why Lisp is not popular with average programmers
- From: Ray Dillinger
- Re: Why Lisp is not popular with average programmers
- From: josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Why Lisp is not popular with average programmers
- From: Ray Dillinger
- Re: Why Lisp is not popular with average programmers
- From: David Steuber
- Re: Why Lisp is not popular with average programmers
- From: Pascal Costanza
- Re: Why Lisp is not popular with average programmers
- Prev by Date: Re: What's so great about lisp?
- Next by Date: Re: Scheme is Lisp - could you validate this statement?...
- Previous by thread: Re: Why Lisp is not popular with average programmers
- Next by thread: Re: Why Lisp is not popular with average programmers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|