Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: Jon Harrop <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 08 Oct 2005 13:25:16 +0100
Joe Marshall wrote:
> Now I want as much static checking as possible, but I'm going to get
> really irritated if it gets in the way.
If that were available then I'd want the final statically-checked code to be
compiled efficiently, i.e. without unnecessary run-time checks and with
optimised pattern matches and so on.
Any idea if such a language exists or if Lisp could be coerced into doing
this? It would probably require two different run-times...
--
Dr Jon D Harrop, Flying Frog Consultancy
http://www.ffconsultancy.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: Pascal Costanza
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- References:
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: Joe Marshall
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: Joe Marshall
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: Lars Brinkhoff
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: Thomas F. Bur***
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: Jon Harrop
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: Juliusz Chroboczek
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: William Bland
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- From: Joe Marshall
- Re: What's so great about lisp?
- Prev by Date: Re: What's so great about lisp?
- Next by Date: Re: handler-bind / handler-case
- Previous by thread: Re: What's so great about lisp?
- Next by thread: Re: What's so great about lisp?
- Index(es):