Re: Suggested problems?

Ulrich Hobelmann <u.hobelmann@xxxxxx> writes:

> Pisin Bootvong wrote:

[..]

> > Only advantage is that I'm allow to walk into CL-PDF's source code. But
> > then, Why would I want to, except to fix the bug in CL-PDF, which the
> > FFI version doesn't have. (In neccessity, I can still read C source
> > code of the library that FFI wrap over).
>
> Exactly. If the C version is perfect, that's cool. But if you want
> to modify the code in any way, I think Lisp is much better.

The idea of a library is that you use it, not fix it. If it's buggy,
file a bug report, or avoid it if it's hopelessly so. Lisp is _of
course_ better, if you have the sources.

Andras
.

Relevant Pages