Re: CL failure stories?
- From: "josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx" <josephoswald@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 Oct 2005 13:44:27 -0700
torve wrote:
> But thats exactly why I posed my original question. I'm a bit dumb and
> make mistakes very easily, especially when a program gets larger -
> there must be something broken with the complexity of large programs...
> So if Haskell would make it possible for me to write non-trivial,
> rather error free programs despite my intellectual shortcoming, and
> without restricting the expressiveness i need, i should invest time
> into learning it.
So you are talking about a one-man project here? Because your original
flame-bait didn't mention that. Most of the success stories you read
are about *teams* of programmers attacking problems that typically
require larger teams in conventional languages. Not single programmers
doing their own thing. Failures only become famous when they involve
enough people, and are usually only loosely related to the
implementation language. Except for trolls on newsgroups who love to
blame their personal failure on a computer language.
.
- References:
- CL failure stories?
- From: torve
- Re: CL failure stories?
- From: Mark Tarver
- Re: CL failure stories?
- From: Alan Crowe
- Re: CL failure stories?
- From: torve
- Re: CL failure stories?
- From: Rene_de_Visser
- Re: CL failure stories?
- From: Pascal Bourguignon
- CL failure stories?
- Prev by Date: Re: What's so great about lisp?
- Next by Date: Re: News on cmucl for windows?
- Previous by thread: Re: CL failure stories?
- Next by thread: Re: CL failure stories?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|