Re: What do we mean by "Identical" ?
- From: newser.bbs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 30 Oct 2005 03:25:30 -0800
Harald , I sincerely wish you have good time during your riding in the
warm breeze.
I think there is misunderstanding between us. I am not a pedagog. In
fact , I have confessed that I am new to lisp.
I believe that you are right that the arguments should be evaluated
before the calling of the function , but this still makes me more and
more confused . What do you think makes "eq" different from "eql"?
Following those procedures you taught me , I can't tell "eq" apart from
"eql".
Again , in "Practical Common Lisp" , Peter tells us that "expression
(eq 3 3) can legally evaluate to either true or false" . Following your
procedures , I'm too foolish to see why it is possible for (eq 3 3 ) to
evaluate to false.
Many thanks if anyone can give me a hint !
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What do we mean by "Identical" ?
- From: Harald Hanche-Olsen
- Re: What do we mean by "Identical" ?
- From: Joe Marshall
- Re: What do we mean by "Identical" ?
- From: John Thingstad
- Re: What do we mean by "Identical" ?
- From: Pascal Costanza
- Re: What do we mean by "Identical" ?
- From: Tayssir John Gabbour
- Re: What do we mean by "Identical" ?
- References:
- What do we mean by "Identical" ?
- From: newser . bbs
- Re: What do we mean by "Identical" ?
- From: newser . bbs
- Re: What do we mean by "Identical" ?
- From: newser . bbs
- Re: What do we mean by "Identical" ?
- From: Harald Hanche-Olsen
- What do we mean by "Identical" ?
- Prev by Date: Re: "Made with Lisp" logos
- Next by Date: Re: Lispnik logo (was Re: Lisp Logo Madness!)
- Previous by thread: Re: What do we mean by "Identical" ?
- Next by thread: Re: What do we mean by "Identical" ?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|