Re: Nested &REST parameter vs. single named parameter

From: Edi Weitz <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2005 19:12:50 +0100

On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 17:38:10 GMT, Peter Seibel <peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> (with-gensyms ...

BTW, I think one should use WITH-UNIQUE-NAMES instead. See the end of
this page

<http://www.cliki.net/WITH-UNIQUE-NAMES>

for my rationale.

Cheers,
Edi.

--

Lisp is not dead, it just smells funny.

Real email: (replace (subseq "spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxx" 5) "edi")
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Nested &REST parameter vs. single named parameter
  - From: Damien Kick
- Re: Nested &REST parameter vs. single named parameter
  - From: Cameron MacKinnon

References:
- Nested &REST parameter vs. single named parameter
  - From: Michael J. Forster
- Re: Nested &REST parameter vs. single named parameter
  - From: Peter Seibel

Prev by Date: Re: Nested &REST parameter vs. single named parameter
Next by Date: Re: Nested &REST parameter vs. single named parameter
Previous by thread: Re: Nested &REST parameter vs. single named parameter
Next by thread: Re: Nested &REST parameter vs. single named parameter
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

Re: delete-file & probe-file on directories
... > directories, IIRC. ... Edi. ... Lisp is not dead, it just smells funny. ...
(comp.lang.lisp)
Re: How to make mod_lisp faster than php?
... When I inquired on cost to get an unlimited redistributable ... Edi. ... Lisp is not dead, it just smells funny. ...
(comp.lang.lisp)
Re: Why Lisp is not popular with average programmers
... developers. ... Edi. ... Lisp is not dead, it just smells funny. ...
(comp.lang.lisp)
Re: CLX/CMUCL: Event processing speed
... Edi. ... Lisp is not dead, it just smells funny. ...
(comp.lang.lisp)
Re: Style question
... Or DOTIMES and DOLIST in simple cases. ... Edi. ... Lisp is not dead, it just smells funny. ...
(comp.lang.lisp)