Re: type systems as libraries
- From: "Marco Antoniotti" <marcoxa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Dec 2005 13:05:42 -0800
It isn't as simple as it seems, plus you do not want a macro layer.
You want something that allows you to work seamlessly with the system.
In any case, you need a unification system to do this :) CL-UNIFICATION
in common-lisp.net is a step in that direction.
Cheers
--
marco
Creighton Hogg wrote:
> Hi guys,
> Has anyone ever real heard of implementing type systems and
> type inference on top of lisp as a kindof macro library?
> I'm picturing something like
> (with-hindley-milner
> (rest-o-the-code))
> Browsing a few pages of google search results I didn't find
> anything to promising. Is this just a bad idea or not done
> for some particular reason?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: type systems as libraries
- From: Creighton Hogg
- Re: type systems as libraries
- References:
- type systems as libraries
- From: Creighton Hogg
- type systems as libraries
- Prev by Date: type systems as libraries
- Next by Date: Re: Arbitrary nested config data. Lisp > YAML?
- Previous by thread: type systems as libraries
- Next by thread: Re: type systems as libraries
- Index(es):