Re: type systems as libraries
- From: Creighton Hogg <wchogg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 15:10:16 -0600
On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, Marco Antoniotti wrote:
> It isn't as simple as it seems, plus you do not want a macro layer.
> You want something that allows you to work seamlessly with the system.
>
> In any case, you need a unification system to do this :) CL-UNIFICATION
> in common-lisp.net is a step in that direction.
Now I'm intrigued: why wouldn't you want a macro layer? In
my eye it would compile into a bunch of expressions that
call the type declarations of CL itself.
Hrmm...is it the fact that it would compile into statements
for the compiler that's the problem?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: type systems as libraries
- From: Marco Antoniotti
- Re: type systems as libraries
- References:
- type systems as libraries
- From: Creighton Hogg
- Re: type systems as libraries
- From: Marco Antoniotti
- type systems as libraries
- Prev by Date: Re: type systems as libraries
- Next by Date: Re: Python and Lisp Test
- Previous by thread: Re: type systems as libraries
- Next by thread: Re: type systems as libraries
- Index(es):