Re: type systems as libraries

On Thu, 29 Dec 2005, dominikus wrote:

> Maybe Qi (built on top of Lisp) is something for you that is worth
> looking at, see
>
> http://www.lambdassociates.org/

Actually this does look pretty interesting, thanks.
I'm not sure if it's exactly what I was thinking of or not,
but it's at least a start.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: type systems as libraries
    ... Maybe Qi (built on top of Lisp) is something for you that is worth ... Dominikus ... Prev by Date: ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: I wish Id never met Lisp
    ... > into paying me to hack on Lisp. ... > for prime time yet because any Cocoa app built with it apparently ... > .app bundle for your application. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Decreasing the "standard deviation" of lisp
    ... Numbers are not built from lists of symbols. ... (defparameter four (succ three)) ... Have a look at any Common Lisp compiler (obviously written in Common ... if you can interface to C you can interface to ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: I am a new lisp user
    ... >>its limits you will realize it is worth the price. ... > is Corman Lisp, I have had limited success with it. ... produce interesting revenues from casual hobbyists. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Modernizing Common Lisp
    ... The Lisp code I run on my Mac won't work on any Lisp ... > wacky stuff above socket, listen, accept, connect, read/write and select. ... Most of the Lisp socket implementations seem ... > Lisp code is so ingrained, that it's not even worth pursuing to port it to ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)