Re: type systems as libraries
- From: David Trudgett <wpower@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 30 Dec 2005 16:07:19 +1100
"RPG" <rpgoldman@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Drew McDermott has done this as part of his suite of Yale tools for
> lisp. Have a look at the software documentation and software tools on
> his page at http://cs-www.cs.yale.edu/homes/dvm/
Checking out a few of the pages there, I came across this one about
CL's FORMAT:
http://cs-www.cs.yale.edu/homes/dvm/format-stinks.html
I think he has a good point there, and it seems to me that FORMAT is
extremely unlispy, even more so than loop (if such a comparison is
possible). On the other hand, I don't notice FORMAT's unlispiness
threatening to transform my Lisp programs into C evilness... so maybe
it's acceptable.
What are people's thoughts on this? Does anyone actually go out of
their way to avoid FORMAT?
David
--
David Trudgett
http://www.zeta.org.au/~wpower/
Fearlessness is the first requisite of spirituality. Cowards can never
be moral.
-- Mohandas Gandhi
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: type systems as libraries
- From: Creighton Hogg
- Re: type systems as libraries
- References:
- type systems as libraries
- From: Creighton Hogg
- Re: type systems as libraries
- From: RPG
- type systems as libraries
- Prev by Date: Re: using setf with assoc
- Next by Date: Re: type systems as libraries
- Previous by thread: Re: type systems as libraries
- Next by thread: Re: type systems as libraries
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|