Re: Verrazano/CFFI R.I.P.?
- From: Kenny Tilton <NOktiltonSPAM@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2005 00:23:31 GMT
Ivan Shvedunov wrote:
Just interesting, how do you deal with the following issues?
- fixnums usually cannot represent full 32-bit numbers, so bignums will be used instead in many cases (very ineffective);
Is this a translation issue or just "C will be faster in any application where 32-bit numbers tend to reach the limit of fixnums"?
- pointer arithmetic, mixing pointer<->arrays, pointer<->uint conversion; - malloc() / free() memory management; ... probably many other things like these ...
My subject was indeed in jest. I just want to get the bulk of 23kloc of C reasonably "re-typed" as CL, so foo(x,y,z); becomes (foo x y z) without pushing my carpal tunnel syndrome over the edge.
I am still open to the possibility of failing completely in the face of C syntax silliness. Even found a confession in K&R that their treating typedef as a storage class specifier in the grammar is a joke. <sigh> Am I the only one who takes programming seriously?!
kt .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Verrazano/CFFI R.I.P.?
- From: verec
- Re: Verrazano/CFFI R.I.P.?
- From: Brian Downing
- Re: Verrazano/CFFI R.I.P.?
- References:
- Verrazano/CFFI R.I.P.?
- From: Kenny Tilton
- Re: Verrazano/CFFI R.I.P.?
- From: Ivan Shvedunov
- Verrazano/CFFI R.I.P.?
- Prev by Date: Re: Verrazano/CFFI R.I.P.?
- Next by Date: Re: conciseness is power
- Previous by thread: Re: Verrazano/CFFI R.I.P.?
- Next by thread: Re: Verrazano/CFFI R.I.P.?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|