Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Eli Gottlieb <eligottlieb@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:27:57 GMT
Pascal Bourguignon wrote:
Just because nobody's thought of anything better than Lisp doesn't make it the ultimate language.David Trudgett <wpower@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
(I like that name, by the way! My only question is, why is Lisp your favourite programming language?! :-))
I've learned a number of programming language, searching everytime for a better one. I've even started to design my own languages. Eventually, I started to use emacs lisp and Common Lisp and found the _ultimate_ language, which frees my mind of that language quest I had.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Kenny Tilton
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Pascal Bourguignon
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- References:
- Lisp is Sin
- From: Adam Connor
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Majorinc , Kazimir
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Sam Steingold
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: David Trudgett
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Bruce Hoult
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: David Trudgett
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Ulrich Hobelmann
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: David Trudgett
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Pascal Bourguignon
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Pascal Bourguignon
- Lisp is Sin
- Prev by Date: Re: Yahoo, Sony buy LISP convert to C/C++
- Next by Date: Re: Yahoo, Sony buy LISP convert to C/C++
- Previous by thread: Re: Lisp is Sin
- Next by thread: Re: Lisp is Sin
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|