Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Eli Gottlieb <eligottlieb@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 00:08:14 GMT
Nathan Baum wrote:
The real reason Lisp has the best OO out there has nothing to do with CLOS and everything to do with Lisp. Lisp is the greatest common denominator of programming languages, and can act like any other programming language if you have the time and know-how to make it so.
Once again, just because a better language hasn't been invented doesn't make Lisp the Supreme Language Ever. I admit that Lisp can emulate (with varying amounts of work) any inferior language so far created, but I doubt it will be able to emulate its superior language - when that is created - without creating half of a buggy and slow compiler/interpreter for that language.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Nathan Baum
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: vedm
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Tayssir John Gabbour
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: André Thieme
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- References:
- Lisp is Sin
- From: Adam Connor
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Majorinc , Kazimir
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Sam Steingold
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: David Trudgett
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Bruce Hoult
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: David Trudgett
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Ulrich Hobelmann
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: David Trudgett
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Pascal Bourguignon
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Pascal Bourguignon
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Eli Gottlieb
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Kenny Tilton
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Eli Gottlieb
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Nathan Baum
- Lisp is Sin
- Prev by Date: Re: Lisp is Sin
- Next by Date: Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!
- Previous by thread: Re: Lisp is Sin
- Next by thread: Re: Lisp is Sin
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|