Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Bill Atkins <NOatkinwSPAM@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 22:03:49 -0500
Eli Gottlieb <eligottlieb@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> vedm wrote:
>> Eli Gottlieb <eligottlieb@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>>Once again, just because a better language hasn't been invented doesn't
>>>make Lisp the Supreme Language Ever. I admit that Lisp can emulate
>> Lisp was not invented, it was discovered, as Paul Graham lucidly
>> explains here:
>> http://www.paulgraham.com/icad.html
>>
> Lisp is not any sort of God Given Scientific Law of Programming
> Language. It was invented, and I've read the stupid essay.
You're right, because the discussion is about Lisp as a language and
its implementations. But vedm's point is a little fuzzier when
applied to Lisp as a notation for expressing functions. Common Lisp
is an invention, no doubt about it, but I'm not sure if mathematical
notations are "invented" or "discovered" or none of the above.
--
Bill Atkins
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Harald Hanche-Olsen
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- References:
- Lisp is Sin
- From: Adam Connor
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Majorinc , Kazimir
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Sam Steingold
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: David Trudgett
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Bruce Hoult
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: David Trudgett
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Ulrich Hobelmann
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: David Trudgett
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Pascal Bourguignon
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Pascal Bourguignon
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Eli Gottlieb
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Kenny Tilton
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Eli Gottlieb
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Nathan Baum
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Eli Gottlieb
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: vedm
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Eli Gottlieb
- Lisp is Sin
- Prev by Date: Re: Problem enabling bracket mode it CLSQL
- Next by Date: Re: Dynamic function bindings
- Previous by thread: Re: Lisp is Sin
- Next by thread: Re: Lisp is Sin
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|