Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: "Tayssir John Gabbour" <tayss_temp2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Jan 2006 17:17:06 -0800
Eli Gottlieb wrote:
> Pascal Bourguignon wrote:
> >>I heard that phrase a year or so ago in this newsgroup, and I was
> >>curious too as to what it could mean. (A google of "dark age" on this
> >>forum shows that people were claiming we were in a computing dark age
> >>as early as 1991, and Alan Kay claimed "the last 20 years have been
> >>basically air guitar" for computing's evolution.)
> >
> >
> > Not only in programming language, but also in other domains such as
> > Operating Systems:
> >
> > http://herpolhode.com/rob/utah2000.pdf
> May I make an observation? From my POV it looks as though both
> programming languages and operating systems suffer/benefit from network
> effects. Users are attracted to both by a corpus of already-existing
> work they can build on, but they both require users to build that
> corpus. In short, they both suffer from chicken-and-egg problems of
> becoming popular enough to be successful and self-sustaining.
Sure, there's various market pressures both for and against Lisp. Some
of them reinforce themselves, like network effects.
But ironically, barriers of entry can be a good thing in the market,
depending on whether you can take advantage of them. We can just look
at any business paperback about some big company, where the CEO is
boasting about entering a market with big barriers to entry.
The big black-and-white techie assumption that barriers to entry = bad
is probably ideological, as then the next question is, "Is there a
class of actors who benefit from these barriers, while others don't?"
And many people seem to have a problem with asking that.
Probably a guess though...
Tayssir
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Eli Gottlieb
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- References:
- Lisp is Sin
- From: Adam Connor
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Majorinc , Kazimir
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Sam Steingold
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: David Trudgett
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Bruce Hoult
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: David Trudgett
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Ulrich Hobelmann
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: David Trudgett
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Pascal Bourguignon
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Pascal Bourguignon
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Eli Gottlieb
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Kenny Tilton
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Eli Gottlieb
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Nathan Baum
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Eli Gottlieb
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Tayssir John Gabbour
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Bill Atkins
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Tayssir John Gabbour
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Pascal Bourguignon
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Eli Gottlieb
- Lisp is Sin
- Prev by Date: Re: Lisp is Sin
- Next by Date: Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time...
- Previous by thread: Re: Lisp is Sin
- Next by thread: Re: Lisp is Sin
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|