Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: ocorrain@xxxxxxxxx (Tiarnán Ó Corráin)
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:45:44 +0000
Pascal Bourguignon <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> Harald Hanche-Olsen <hanche@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> I think it may be useful to think of an invention as more of a
>> discovery if it is necessary or very much better suited than any
>> alternative to the task at hand.
>
> I think that since we have on line dictionnaries, there's no excuse
> not to read it more, and constat that to invent is synonym of to
> discover and to discover is synonym of to invent.
Or just bite the bullet and come out as a Platonist. One of the
reasons, surely, for Lisp's superiority is that it is based on an
attempt to formalize all mathematics in terms of a concept that is
simplicity itself. Thus the rules for "parsing" an expression can be
written in two lines, then we can get onto the interesting stuff.
--
Tiarnán
.
- References:
- Lisp is Sin
- From: Adam Connor
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Majorinc , Kazimir
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Sam Steingold
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: David Trudgett
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Bruce Hoult
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: David Trudgett
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Ulrich Hobelmann
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: David Trudgett
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Pascal Bourguignon
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Pascal Bourguignon
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Eli Gottlieb
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Kenny Tilton
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Eli Gottlieb
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Nathan Baum
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Eli Gottlieb
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: vedm
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Eli Gottlieb
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Bill Atkins
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Harald Hanche-Olsen
- Re: Lisp is Sin
- From: Pascal Bourguignon
- Lisp is Sin
- Prev by Date: Re: hoots n hollers with c2lisp
- Next by Date: Re: only 2 simple questions : a newbie
- Previous by thread: Re: Lisp is Sin
- Next by thread: Re: Lisp is Sin
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|