Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?
- From: Adam Connor <ufo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 15:57:36 -0600
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:35:41 +0000, Christophe Rhodes
<csr21@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Feeding the troll is likely to be unproductive, but CLiki came into
>being on May 29, 2000, so claims for "most stuff over there" having
>been sitting there for longer than five years aren't just wrong,
>they're foolishly wrong.
Why do you assume trolling? Is it not possible to ask these questions
without being a troll?
--
adamnospamaustin.rr.com
s/nospam/c\./
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?
- From: Kenny Tilton
- Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?
- From: Tin Gherdanarra
- Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?
- From: Christophe Rhodes
- Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?
- References:
- Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?
- From: Tin Gherdanarra
- Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?
- From: Cameron MacKinnon
- Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?
- From: Tin Gherdanarra
- Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?
- From: Christophe Rhodes
- Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?
- Prev by Date: Re: Any leak in my first macro? :)
- Next by Date: Re: Any leak in my first macro? :)
- Previous by thread: Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?
- Next by thread: Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|