Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?
- From: Tin Gherdanarra <tinman31337@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 29 Jan 2006 23:30:44 +0100
Adam Connor wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:35:41 +0000, Christophe Rhodes <csr21@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Feeding the troll is likely to be unproductive, but CLiki came into being on May 29, 2000, so claims for "most stuff over there" having been sitting there for longer than five years aren't just wrong, they're foolishly wrong.
Why do you assume trolling? Is it not possible to ask these questions without being a troll?
Thanks for your support (:
-- adamnospamaustin.rr.com s/nospam/c\./
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?
- From: jayessay
- Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?
- References:
- Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?
- From: Tin Gherdanarra
- Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?
- From: Cameron MacKinnon
- Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?
- From: Tin Gherdanarra
- Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?
- From: Christophe Rhodes
- Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?
- From: Adam Connor
- Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?
- Prev by Date: Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?
- Next by Date: Re: (with-open-file (... :append )) issue/bug?
- Previous by thread: Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?
- Next by thread: Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|