Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field

What I like about Common Lisp is that it has support for both of them;
both weakish and strongish typing. I also like the fact that it has got
it in the right order; weak first, as default - and strong later, if
you need it.

The other way around seems hopelessly old fashioned, unnecessary and
just plain annoying while coding.

I'm never going back. :)

--
mvh,
Lars Rune Nøstdal
http://lars.nostdal.org/

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Scieneer Common Lisp free for non-commercial use.
    ... The Scieneer Common Lisp features mature multi-threaded support ... Check list when considering a Common Lisp implementation for scalable ... Does it support multi-threading that scales on ubiquitous multi- ... The Scieneer Common Lisp is built on the operating system's native ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • GNU CLISP 2.33 (2004-03-17)
    ... GNU CLISP is a Common Lisp implementation by Bruno Haible of Karlsruhe ... * Removed Acorn RISCOS support. ... * Removed support for Borland C compiler on Win32. ...
    (comp.os.linux.announce)
  • [ANN] New release of Closer to MOP (v0.6)
    ... Support for Embeddable Common Lisp has been completely reworked, and ECL is now officially supported in Closer to MOP. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: How Common Lisp sucks
    ... support from the community, you should be able to quickly ... I'd like to write a Common Lisp program with a small GUI. ... and could be undertaken on commercial terms. ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)
  • Re: Scieneer Common Lisp free for non-commercial use.
    ... product is unrestricted and the same as the commercial product apart ... Support may also be purchased from Scieneer. ... enabling applications to scale on multi-processor hardware now! ... Common Lisp implementation has supported this since its release over ...
    (comp.lang.lisp)