Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field
What I like about Common Lisp is that it has support for both of them;
both weakish and strongish typing. I also like the fact that it has got
it in the right order; weak first, as default - and strong later, if
you need it.
The other way around seems hopelessly old fashioned, unnecessary and
just plain annoying while coding.
I'm never going back. :)
--
mvh,
Lars Rune Nøstdal
http://lars.nostdal.org/
.
Relevant Pages
- Re: Scieneer Common Lisp free for non-commercial use.
... The Scieneer Common Lisp features mature multi-threaded support ... Check list when considering a Common Lisp implementation for scalable ... Does it support multi-threading that scales on ubiquitous multi- ... The Scieneer Common Lisp is built on the operating system's native ... (comp.lang.lisp) - GNU CLISP 2.33 (2004-03-17)
... GNU CLISP is a Common Lisp implementation by Bruno Haible of Karlsruhe ... * Removed Acorn RISCOS support. ... * Removed support for Borland C compiler on Win32. ... (comp.os.linux.announce) - [ANN] New release of Closer to MOP (v0.6)
... Support for Embeddable Common Lisp has been completely reworked, and ECL is now officially supported in Closer to MOP. ... (comp.lang.lisp) - Re: How Common Lisp sucks
... support from the community, you should be able to quickly ... I'd like to write a Common Lisp program with a small GUI. ... and could be undertaken on commercial terms. ... (comp.lang.lisp) - Re: Scieneer Common Lisp free for non-commercial use.
... product is unrestricted and the same as the commercial product apart ... Support may also be purchased from Scieneer. ... enabling applications to scale on multi-processor hardware now! ... Common Lisp implementation has supported this since its release over ... (comp.lang.lisp) |
|