Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field
- From: Pascal Costanza <pc@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:39:23 +0100
Jon Harrop wrote:
Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk wrote:
"pp" <pedro.e.pinto@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
http://opal.cabochon.com/~stevey/blog-rants/strong-weak-typing.html
This article is being discussed at http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/node/1268 and the general conclusion is
that it's clueless.
That sounds about right. Many of the conclusions seem illogical to me, as other people have pointed out.
However, one interesting point is the question of how long it takes to learn a language. I certainly agree that you need to know something about the static type systems and checkers of more advanced languages in order to make good use of the language. That's extra learning but is it offset by not having to do so much unit testing and not having to be so adept with a run-time debugger?
You have to write tests and debug your programs anyway, no matter whether you use a statically typed language or not.
Pascal
-- My website: http://p-cos.net Closer to MOP & ContextL: http://common-lisp.net/project/closer/ .
- References:
- Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field
- From: pp
- Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field
- From: Jon Harrop
- Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field
- Prev by Date: Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field
- Next by Date: Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field
- Previous by thread: Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field
- Next by thread: Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|