Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk <qrczak@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:48:13 +0100
Jon Harrop <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> I certainly agree that you need to know something about the static
> type systems and checkers of more advanced languages in order to
> make good use of the language. That's extra learning but is it
> offset by not having to do so much unit testing and not having to be
> so adept with a run-time debugger?
You learn it once, and make use of it every time, so considering these
aspects alone it's definitely worth the effort in the long run.
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk
\__/ qrczak@xxxxxxxxxx
^^ http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/
.
- References:
- Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field
- From: pp
- Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field
- From: Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
- Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field
- From: Jon Harrop
- Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field
- Prev by Date: Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field
- Next by Date: Re: Decent datastructure for queue operations
- Previous by thread: Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field
- Next by thread: Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field
- Index(es):