comp.lang.lisp

• Date Index

---

• Loading packages, Matt
  • Re: Loading packages, justinhj
• CLisp and Vim, Matt
  • Re: CLisp and Vim, bradb
• Problems with cmucl 19c on solaris 10/spark, marc spitzer
  • Re: Problems with cmucl 19c on solaris 10/spark, Raymond Toy
• New Lisp catch-phrase (?), Vladimir Nesterovsky
• Problem getting CL-XML to work with OpenMCL, Foxpointe
  • Re: Problem getting CL-XML to work with OpenMCL, Ulrich Hobelmann
    • Re: Problem getting CL-XML to work with OpenMCL, Foxpointe
• Mandelbrot Set generator (source code available), David Trudgett
• Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field, pp
  • Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field, Lars Rune Nøstdal
  • Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field, André Thieme
    • Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field, pp
    • Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field, Ulrich Hobelmann
    • Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field, Pascal Costanza
  • Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
    • Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field, Pascal Costanza
    • Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field, Jon Harrop
      • Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
      • Re: Static/Dynamic typing, lessons from the field, anamax
• Problems writing to clisp mailing list, Trastabuga
  • Re: Problems writing to clisp mailing list, justinhj
    • Re: Problems writing to clisp mailing list, Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: Problems writing to clisp mailing list, Rob Thorpe
      • Re: Problems writing to clisp mailing list, justinhj
      • Re: Problems writing to clisp mailing list, Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: Problems writing to clisp mailing list, Rob Thorpe
      • Re: Problems writing to clisp mailing list, Frank Buss
• slurp-file, Matt
  • Re: slurp-file, carlos . ungil
    • Re: slurp-file, Matt
  • Re: slurp-file, Wade Humeniuk
    • Re: slurp-file, Matt
      • Re: slurp-file, Wade Humeniuk
  • Re: slurp-file, Matt
  • Re: slurp-file, z0d
    • Re: slurp-file, Matt
    • Re: slurp-file, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
• Decent datastructure for queue operations, meng
  • Re: Decent datastructure for queue operations, mmcconnell17704
    • Re: Decent datastructure for queue operations, meng
      • Re: Decent datastructure for queue operations, Edi Weitz
      • Re: Decent datastructure for queue operations, justinhj
      • Re: Decent datastructure for queue operations, meng
      • Re: Decent datastructure for queue operations, Dr. John A.R. Williams
  • Re: Decent datastructure for queue operations, Russell McManus
    • Re: Decent datastructure for queue operations, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Decent datastructure for queue operations, Russell McManus
    • Re: Decent datastructure for queue operations, meng
      • Re: Decent datastructure for queue operations, Russell McManus
  • Re: Decent datastructure for queue operations, Glenn . Ehrlich
  • Re: Decent datastructure for queue operations, Robert Strandh
  • Re: Decent datastructure for queue operations, Kaz Kylheku
  • Re: Decent datastructure for queue operations, Thomas F. Burdick
• xector data structure, Robert Bruce Carleton
• [Ann:] Ltk v. 0.88 released, Peter Herth
  • Re: [Ann:] Ltk v. 0.88 released, Marco Gidde
    • Re: [Ann:] Ltk v. 0.88 released, Peter Herth
      • Re: [Ann:] Ltk v. 0.88 released, Paolo Amoroso
      • Re: [Ann:] Ltk v. 0.88 released, Peter Herth
• allegrocache and persistent object storage, remixer
• Beating The Averages -- No Man bites dog, Tin Gherdanarra
  • Re: Beating The Averages -- No Man bites dog, Raffael Cavallaro
• How to check that symbol denotes type ?, tichy
  • Re: How to check that symbol denotes type ?, sross
    • Re: How to check that symbol denotes type ?, Christophe Rhodes
      • Re: How to check that symbol denotes type ?, sross
      • Re: How to check that symbol denotes type ?, Peter Seibel
      • Re: How to check that symbol denotes type ?, sross
      • Re: How to check that symbol denotes type ?, Thomas A. Russ
• semi-urgent request for common-idioms, rif
• Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
  • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Kenny Tilton
    • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Frank Buss
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tayssir John Gabbour
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tayssir John Gabbour
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tayssir John Gabbour
  • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Cameron MacKinnon
    • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Christophe Rhodes
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Adam Connor
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Christophe Rhodes
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, jayessay
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, joswig
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Wade Humeniuk
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Wade Humeniuk
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Randall Randall
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, jayessay
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, André Thieme
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Ron Garret
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Wade Humeniuk
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Edi Weitz
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, André Thieme
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Ron Garret
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Wade Humeniuk
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Ron Garret
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Ron Garret
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Paolo Amoroso
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Wade Humeniuk
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Bill Atkins
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Edi Weitz
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Espen Vestre
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Ron Garret
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Espen Vestre
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Ron Garret
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Edi Weitz
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Paolo Amoroso
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, joswig
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Rob Warnock
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, André Thieme
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, André Thieme
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Edi Weitz
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, dan
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Pisin Bootvong
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, alessiostalla
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Paul Griffioen
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Paolo Amoroso
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Peter Herth
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, funkyj
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, André Thieme
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Paolo Amoroso
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Pisin Bootvong
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Vagif Verdi
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, André Thieme
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Pisin Bootvong
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, joswig
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Rainer Joswig
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Edi Weitz
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Ivan Boldyrev
      • Re: Interesting developments since "Beating the averages"?, Robert Uhl
• Q about types which are not classes., tichy
• Any leak in my first macro? :), LuisGLopez
  • Re: Any leak in my first macro? :), pkhuong
  • Re: Any leak in my first macro? :), Coby Beck
  • Re: Any leak in my first macro? :), Tayssir John Gabbour
  • Re: Any leak in my first macro? :), verec
    • Re: Any leak in my first macro? :), LuisGLopez
      • Re: Any leak in my first macro? :), Frank Buss
      • Re: Any leak in my first macro? :), LuisGLopez
      • Re: Any leak in my first macro? :), Wade Humeniuk
      • Re: Any leak in my first macro? :), LuisGLopez
      • Re: Any leak in my first macro? :), verec
      • Re: Any leak in my first macro? :), LuisGLopez
      • Re: Any leak in my first macro? :), verec
      • Re: Any leak in my first macro? :), verec
  • Re: Any leak in my first macro? :), Pascal Bourguignon
    • Re: Any leak in my first macro? :), LuisGLopez
      • Re: Any leak in my first macro? :), Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Any leak in my first macro? :), Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: Any leak in my first macro? :), Pascal Bourguignon
  • Re: Any leak in my first macro? :), Kaz Kylheku
    • Re: Any leak in my first macro? :), Kaz Kylheku
• (with-open-file (... :append )) issue/bug?, Mike
  • Re: (with-open-file (... :append )) issue/bug?, Barry Margolin
    • Re: (with-open-file (... :append )) issue/bug?, Mike
      • Re: (with-open-file (... :append )) issue/bug?, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: (with-open-file (... :append )) issue/bug?, Mike
  • Re: (with-open-file (... :append )) issue/bug?, Christophe Rhodes
    • Re: (with-open-file (... :append )) issue/bug?, Jeremy Smith
• one apache with multiple lisp instances via modlisp, Otto Diesenbacher
  • Re: one apache with multiple lisp instances via modlisp, Edi Weitz
    • Re: one apache with multiple lisp instances via modlisp, Otto Diesenbacher
• Re: constructing a lambda, Barry Margolin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: constructing a lambda, Coby Beck
    • Re: constructing a lambda, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: constructing a lambda, Coby Beck
  • Re: constructing a lambda, Kaz Kylheku
• proclaim/declaim and multiple source files, Giorgos Pontikakis
  • Re: proclaim/declaim and multiple source files, Barry Margolin
• Why ` and ', netytan
  • Re: Why ` and ', Harald Hanche-Olsen
  • Re: Why ` and ', Pascal Costanza
    • Re: Why ` and ', Kaz Kylheku
  • Re: Why ` and ', Coby Beck
  • Re: Why ` and ', Frank Buss
    • Re: Why ` and ', netytan
      • Re: Why ` and ', Bill Atkins
      • Re: Why ` and ', Bill Atkins
      • Re: Why ` and ', Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Why ` and ', Tayssir John Gabbour
      • Re: Why ` and ', Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Why ` and ', Kaz Kylheku
  • Re: Why ` and ', Kaz Kylheku
  • Re: Why ` and ', Rob Thorpe
• common-lisp.net connectivity problems, Erik Enge
• UCW on windows ACL 7, Vagif Verdi
• word puzzle, Frank Buss
  • Re: word puzzle, Jens Axel Søgaard
    • Re: word puzzle, Jens Axel Søgaard
    • Re: word puzzle, Coby Beck
    • Re: word puzzle, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
  • Re: word puzzle, Wade Humeniuk
    • Re: word puzzle, Frank Buss
      • Re: word puzzle, Alexander Schmolck
      • Re: word puzzle, Frank Buss
      • Re: word puzzle, Alexander Schmolck
      • Re: word puzzle, Frank Buss
      • Re: word puzzle, Andrew Philpot
  • Re: word puzzle, Frank Buss
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: word puzzle, Pascal Bourguignon
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: word puzzle, joswig
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: word puzzle, André Thieme
• Re: SeaFunc meets Tue. Jan 31st, Paul Rubin
  • Re: SeaFunc meets Tue. Jan 31st, Peter Seibel
• setq vs setf?, Mike
  • Re: setq vs setf?, Ulrich Hobelmann
    • Re: setq vs setf?, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: setq vs setf?, Brian Downing
  • Re: setq vs setf?, Barry Margolin
    • Re: setq vs setf?, Kaz Kylheku
  • Re: setq vs setf?, Jeff M.
    • Re: setq vs setf?, Mike
      • Re: setq vs setf?, André Thieme
      • Re: setq vs setf?, Barry Margolin
    • Re: setq vs setf?, Rob Warnock
• Problem getting SLIME to work on Fedora, stephen . odonnell
  • Re: Problem getting SLIME to work on Fedora, GB
  • Re: Problem getting SLIME to work on Fedora, peter . eddy
• implementing Haskell style flip for Lisp, jra
  • Re: implementing Haskell style flip for Lisp, Brian Downing
    • Re: implementing Haskell style flip for Lisp, jra
      • Re: implementing Haskell style flip for Lisp, Wade Humeniuk
      • Re: implementing Haskell style flip for Lisp, Jason Kantz
  • Re: implementing Haskell style flip for Lisp, josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
• substitute #\& "&amp;" my-str, verec
  • Re: substitute #\& "&amp;" my-str, Kaz Kylheku
    • Re: substitute #\& "&amp;" my-str, verec
      • Re: substitute #\& "&amp;" my-str, Kaz Kylheku
  • Re: substitute #\& "&amp;" my-str, Wade Humeniuk
    • Re: substitute #\& "&amp;" my-str, verec
      • Re: substitute #\& "&amp;" my-str, Kaz Kylheku
      • Message not available
      • Re: substitute #\& "&amp;" my-str, Edi Weitz
      • Re: substitute #\& "&amp;" my-str, verec
      • Re: substitute #\& "&amp;" my-str, Edi Weitz
      • Re: substitute #\& "&amp;" my-str, verec
• Handling 'circular' vectors, Martin DeMello
  • Re: Handling 'circular' vectors, Raymond Toy
  • Re: Handling 'circular' vectors, Alexander Schmolck
  • Re: Handling 'circular' vectors, Larry Clapp
  • Re: Handling 'circular' vectors, Wade Humeniuk
  • Re: Handling 'circular' vectors, Kaz Kylheku
  • Re: Handling 'circular' vectors, Tobias C. Rittweiler
    • Re: Handling 'circular' vectors, Kaz Kylheku
  • Re: Handling 'circular' vectors, Martin DeMello
• about SICP, arnuld
  • Re: about SICP, Luís Oliveira
    • Re: about SICP, arnuld
      • Re: about SICP, Kenny Tilton
  • Re: about SICP, Pascal Bourguignon
    • Re: about SICP, justinhj
  • Re: about SICP, Arie van Wingerden
    • Re: about SICP, Jens Axel Søgaard
• Redefining a method, Timofei Shatrov
  • Re: Redefining a method, Pascal Costanza
  • Re: Redefining a method, Thomas A. Russ
    • Re: Redefining a method, Zach Beane
    • Re: Redefining a method, Timofei Shatrov
      • Re: Redefining a method, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Redefining a method, M Jared Finder
      • Re: Redefining a method, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Redefining a method, M Jared Finder
      • Re: Redefining a method, Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: Redefining a method, M Jared Finder
      • Re: Redefining a method, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Redefining a method, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Redefining a method, adejneka
      • Re: Redefining a method, Pascal Costanza
    • Re: Redefining a method, Duncan Harvey
  • Re: Redefining a method, Coby Beck
• "transposing" list of lists, AJ Rossini
  • Re: "transposing" list of lists, Martin Svenson
  • Re: "transposing" list of lists, Peder O. Klingenberg
  • Re: "transposing" list of lists, Pascal Bourguignon
    • Re: "transposing" list of lists, AJ Rossini
      • Re: "transposing" list of lists, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: "transposing" list of lists, AJ Rossini
• Common Lisp Application Builder news, Frank Buss
  • Re: Common Lisp Application Builder news, Timofei Shatrov
    • Re: Common Lisp Application Builder news, Frank Buss
      • Re: Common Lisp Application Builder news, justinhj
      • Re: Common Lisp Application Builder news, Frank Buss
      • Re: Common Lisp Application Builder news, Frank Buss
      • Re: Common Lisp Application Builder news, Joerg Hoehle
      • Re: Common Lisp Application Builder news, Frank Buss
    • Re: Common Lisp Application Builder news, Frank Buss
  • Re: Common Lisp Application Builder news, Joerg Hoehle
    • Re: Common Lisp Application Builder news, Frank Buss
      • Re: Common Lisp Application Builder news, justinhj
• How to turn off some CLOS warnings in CLISP?, Mikalai
• Multiple things with side-effects with if, KeithSpook
  • Re: Multiple things with side-effects with if, JP Massar
  • Re: Multiple things with side-effects with if, Edi Weitz
    • Re: Multiple things with side-effects with if, KeithSpook
  • Re: Multiple things with side-effects with if, John Thingstad
• CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., funkyj
  • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Pascal Costanza
    • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Kenny Tilton
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Pascal Costanza
    • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., krungthorn
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., funkyj
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Pascal Costanza
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Pascal Costanza
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Adrian Kubala
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Pascal Costanza
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., John Thingstad
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., jayessay
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Pascal Costanza
  • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Kenny Tilton
    • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Kaz Kylheku
  • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Kaz Kylheku
    • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., funkyj
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Alexander Schmolck
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Jens Axel Søgaard
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., funkyj
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Jens Axel Søgaard
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Pascal Costanza
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Jens Axel Søgaard
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Jens Axel Søgaard
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Pascal Costanza
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Jens Axel Søgaard
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Kaz Kylheku
    • Message not available
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Pascal Bourguignon
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Pascal Costanza
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Coby Beck
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Pascal Costanza
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., patro
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Nicolas Neuss
    • Message not available
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Marcus Breiing
  • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Jens Axel Søgaard
    • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Christophe Rhodes
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Jens Axel Søgaard
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Kenny Tilton
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Jens Axel Søgaard
    • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., funkyj
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Jens Axel Søgaard
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Peter Seibel
  • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Wade Humeniuk
    • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., rsheridan6
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., Jens Axel Søgaard
      • Re: CL vs scheme macros, namespaces., rsheridan6
• productivity improvement with Lisp over Python? Haskell?, John M. Gabriele
  • Re: productivity improvement with Lisp over Python? Haskell?, rsheridan6
    • Re: productivity improvement with Lisp over Python? Haskell?, John M. Gabriele
    • Re: productivity improvement with Lisp over Python? Haskell?, Robert Uhl
  • Re: productivity improvement with Lisp over Python? Haskell?, rolfotto
  • Re: productivity improvement with Lisp over Python? Haskell?, Fernando Rodríguez
  • Re: productivity improvement with Lisp over Python? Haskell?, André Thieme
    • Re: productivity improvement with Lisp over Python? Haskell?, John M. Gabriele
      • Re: productivity improvement with Lisp over Python? Haskell?, bradb
      • Re: productivity improvement with Lisp over Python? Haskell?, Larry Clapp
      • Re: productivity improvement with Lisp over Python? Haskell?, André Thieme
      • Re: productivity improvement with Lisp over Python? Haskell?, Larry Clapp
  • Re: productivity improvement with Lisp over Python? Haskell?, Tim X
  • Re: productivity improvement with Lisp over Python? Haskell?, Majorinc , Kazimir
    • Re: productivity improvement with Lisp over Python? Haskell?, john_sips_tea
• lock file question, jeff.wolfjb@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: lock file question, Sam Steingold
    • Re: lock file question, jeff.wolfjb@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: lock file question, Juliusz Chroboczek
      • Re: lock file question, wolfjb
  • Re: lock file question, Barry Margolin
  • Re: lock file question, Thomas A. Russ
• (setf method), tricks and manipulation, Andrew Lawson
  • Re: (setf method), tricks and manipulation, Frode Vatvedt Fjeld
    • Re: (setf method), tricks and manipulation, Andrew Lawson
      • Re: (setf method), tricks and manipulation, Frode Vatvedt Fjeld
      • Re: (setf method), tricks and manipulation, Andrew Lawson
      • Re: (setf method), tricks and manipulation, Frode Vatvedt Fjeld
      • Re: (setf method), tricks and manipulation, Thomas A. Russ
  • Re: (setf method), tricks and manipulation, Ivan Boldyrev
• Deploying patches to running web apps, Jonathon McKitrick
  • Re: Deploying patches to running web apps, Petter Gustad
    • Re: Deploying patches to running web apps, Christophe Rhodes
      • Re: Deploying patches to running web apps, Petter Gustad
      • Re: Deploying patches to running web apps, senator
      • Re: Deploying patches to running web apps, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Deploying patches to running web apps, Christophe Rhodes
      • Re: Deploying patches to running web apps, Thomas A. Russ
      • Re: Deploying patches to running web apps, Paul Wallich
      • Re: Deploying patches to running web apps, Christophe Rhodes
      • Re: Deploying patches to running web apps, Thomas F. Burdick
  • Re: Deploying patches to running web apps, John Thingstad
• Seeking help with reading a file, Tony
  • Re: Seeking help with reading a file, Eric Lavigne
    • Re: Seeking help with reading a file, Edi Weitz
  • Re: Seeking help with reading a file, Edi Weitz
  • Re: Seeking help with reading a file, Wade Humeniuk
    • Re: Seeking help with reading a file, Tony
• New PGP Key, Thomas F. Burdick
  • Re: New PGP Key, Thomas F. Burdick
  • Re: New PGP Key, Steven E. Harris
• GNU CLISP 2.38 (2006-01-24) released, Sam Steingold
  • Re: GNU CLISP 2.38 (2006-01-24) released, Timofei Shatrov
    • Re: GNU CLISP 2.38 (2006-01-24) released, Kaz Kylheku
    • Re: GNU CLISP 2.38 (2006-01-24) released, Sam Steingold
    • Re: GNU CLISP 2.38 (2006-01-24) released, Thomas F. Burdick
  • Re: GNU CLISP 2.38 (2006-01-24) released, Bill Atkins
    • Re: GNU CLISP 2.38 (2006-01-24) released, Timofei Shatrov
      • Re: GNU CLISP 2.38 (2006-01-24) released, Peter Herth
      • Re: GNU CLISP 2.38 (2006-01-24) released, Joerg Hoehle
  • Re: GNU CLISP 2.38 (2006-01-24) released, pj
    • Re: GNU CLISP 2.38 (2006-01-24) released, Tony
• asdf-install patch, Jason Kantz
• [how] adding new slots interactively, ctu
  • Re: [how] adding new slots interactively, Pascal Bourguignon
    • Re: adding new slots interactively, ctu
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, ctu
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, ctu
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, jayessay
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, ctu
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, jayessay
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, ctu
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, jayessay
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, Thomas A. Russ
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, ctu
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, Thomas A. Russ
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, ctu
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, Adrian Kubala
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, ctu
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, ctu
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, ctu
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, ctu
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, Fred Gilham
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, Pascal Bourguignon
  • Re: adding new slots interactively, sross
    • Re: adding new slots interactively, sross
  • Re: [how] adding new slots interactively, Thomas A. Russ
  • Re: [how] adding new slots interactively, John Thingstad
  • Re: [how] adding new slots interactively, Pascal Costanza
    • Re: [how] adding new slots interactively, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: [how] adding new slots interactively, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: [how] adding new slots interactively, Coby Beck
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, ctu
      • Re: adding new slots interactively, Coby Beck
      • Re: [how] adding new slots interactively, Michael Price
• Anyone here use charting in cl-pdf?, Jonathon McKitrick
• Extensive use of change-class., rsobriquet
  • Re: Extensive use of change-class., Kenny Tilton
    • Re: Extensive use of change-class., rsobriquet
      • Re: Extensive use of change-class., Alan Crowe
      • Re: Extensive use of change-class., Ron Garret
      • Re: Extensive use of change-class., Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Extensive use of change-class., Brad Might
      • Re: Extensive use of change-class., rsobriquet
      • Re: Extensive use of change-class., Barry Margolin
      • Re: Extensive use of change-class., Brad Might
      • Re: Extensive use of change-class., Peter Seibel
  • Re: Extensive use of change-class., Alan Crowe
  • Re: Extensive use of change-class., Thomas A. Russ
• UCW on windows, Vagif Verdi
  • Re: UCW on windows, Kenny Tilton
    • Re: UCW on windows, Edi Weitz
      • Re: UCW on windows, Kenny Tilton
  • Re: UCW on windows, Pascal Bourguignon
    • Re: UCW on windows, Joe Marshall
      • Re: UCW on windows, Pascal Bourguignon
  • Re: UCW on windows, Timofei Shatrov
    • Re: UCW on windows, Vagif Verdi
  • Re: UCW on windows, Alberto Santini
    • Re: UCW on windows, Vagif Verdi
      • Re: UCW on windows, Vagif Verdi
      • Re: UCW on windows, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: UCW on windows, Fred Gilham
      • Re: UCW on windows, André Thieme
      • Re: UCW on windows, Vagif Verdi
      • Re: UCW on windows, André Thieme
      • Re: UCW on windows, Pascal Bourguignon
• Possible SLIME instability with CLX in CMUCL?, David Trudgett
  • Re: Possible SLIME instability with CLX in CMUCL?, Michael Price
    • Re: Possible SLIME instability with CLX in CMUCL?, David Trudgett
      • Re: Possible SLIME instability with CLX in CMUCL?, Pascal Bourguignon
  • Re: Possible SLIME instability with CLX in CMUCL?, Pascal Bourguignon
• Portable AllegroServe and LispBox 0.7, rditmore@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Portable AllegroServe and LispBox 0.7, André Thieme
• newb and paredit, Leif Dyvik
  • Re: newb and paredit, David Trudgett
  • Re: newb and paredit, Bill Atkins
  • Re: newb and paredit, senator
  • Re: newb and paredit, Taylor Campbell
    • Re: newb and paredit, Leif Dyvik
• graphical representation of code, Pavol . Severa
  • Re: graphical representation of code, Thomas A. Russ
    • Re: graphical representation of code, Bill Atkins
      • Re: graphical representation of code, Fred Gilham
      • Re: graphical representation of code, bob_bane
      • Re: graphical representation of code, Tayssir John Gabbour
    • Re: graphical representation of code, dlp
  • Re: graphical representation of code, jayded
  • Re: graphical representation of code, JP Massar
  • Re: graphical representation of code, JShrager
    • Re: graphical representation of code, Pavol . Severa
      • Re: graphical representation of code, Bruce Stephens
      • Re: graphical representation of code, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: graphical representation of code, John Thingstad
      • Re: graphical representation of code, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: graphical representation of code, gtewalt
      • Re: graphical representation of code, gtewalt
• Combinations: recursion, iteration, or other options?, Andrew Baine
  • Re: Combinations: recursion, iteration, or other options?, Thomas A. Russ
    • Re: Combinations: recursion, iteration, or other options?, Andrew Baine
  • Re: Combinations: recursion, iteration, or other options?, Nathan Baum
  • Re: Combinations: recursion, iteration, or other options?, David Sletten
• "Internal" packages in ASDF, RPG
  • Re: "Internal" packages in ASDF, Pascal Bourguignon
    • Re: "Internal" packages in ASDF, RPG
• mop:ensure-class-using-class question, zaks
  • Re: mop:ensure-class-using-class question, Pascal Costanza
• CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Paolo Amoroso
  • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Christophe Rhodes
    • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Thomas F. Burdick
    • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Bill Atkins
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Christophe Rhodes
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Edi Weitz
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Christophe Rhodes
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, bradb
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Juho Snellman
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, bradb
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Christophe Rhodes
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, bradb
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Steven E. Harris
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Tim X
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Christophe Rhodes
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, bradb
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, William Bland
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Juho Snellman
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Julian Squires
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Juliusz Chroboczek
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Julian Squires
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Peter Seibel
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Peter Seibel
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Juliusz Chroboczek
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Nathan Baum
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Christophe Rhodes
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Christophe Rhodes
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Paolo Amoroso
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Ivan Boldyrev
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Nathan Baum
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Christophe Rhodes
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Stefan Scholl
      • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Steven E. Harris
  • Re: CLiki and ALU Wiki sites massively spammed, Paolo Amoroso
• lisp plug-in for Eclipse?, Lei Tang
  • Re: lisp plug-in for Eclipse?, dboucher
• Quick (hopefully) help with format, senator
  • Re: Quick (hopefully) help with format, Frank Buss
  • Re: Quick (hopefully) help with format, Coby Beck
  • Re: Quick (hopefully) help with format, Pascal Bourguignon
    • Re: Quick (hopefully) help with format, Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: Quick (hopefully) help with format, senator
      • Re: Quick (hopefully) help with format, Sam Steingold
      • Re: Quick (hopefully) help with format, Cameron MacKinnon
• McCLIM, last.fm, how to run that sweet music browser in CL?, Emre Sevinc
  • Re: McCLIM, last.fm, how to run that sweet music browser in CL?, Bill Atkins
• Problem enabling bracket mode it CLSQL, Jonathon McKitrick
  • Re: Problem enabling bracket mode it CLSQL, Petter Gustad
    • Re: Problem enabling bracket mode it CLSQL, Jonathon McKitrick
      • Re: Problem enabling bracket mode it CLSQL, Coby Beck
      • Re: Problem enabling bracket mode it CLSQL, Jonathon McKitrick
      • Re: Problem enabling bracket mode it CLSQL, Coby Beck
      • Re: Problem enabling bracket mode it CLSQL, Asbjørn Bjørnstad
      • Re: Problem enabling bracket mode it CLSQL, Asbjørn Bjørnstad
      • Re: Problem enabling bracket mode it CLSQL, Rob Warnock
      • Re: Problem enabling bracket mode it CLSQL, Jonathon McKitrick
      • Re: Problem enabling bracket mode it CLSQL, Rob Warnock
      • Re: Problem enabling bracket mode it CLSQL, Coby Beck
      • Re: Problem enabling bracket mode it CLSQL, Rob Warnock
      • Re: Problem enabling bracket mode it CLSQL, Coby Beck
      • Re: Problem enabling bracket mode it CLSQL, John Thingstad
      • Re: Problem enabling bracket mode it CLSQL, John Thingstad
      • Re: Problem enabling bracket mode it CLSQL, Harald Hanche-Olsen
      • Re: Problem enabling bracket mode it CLSQL, Coby Beck
      • Re: Problem enabling bracket mode it CLSQL, Jonathon McKitrick
  • Re: Problem enabling bracket mode it CLSQL, Edi Weitz
    • Re: Problem enabling bracket mode it CLSQL, Jonathon McKitrick
      • Re: Problem enabling bracket mode it CLSQL, Edi Weitz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Problem enabling bracket mode it CLSQL, Jonathon McKitrick
    • Re: Problem enabling bracket mode it CLSQL, R. Mattes
• accessing unspecified slots, Eric Lavigne
  • Re: accessing unspecified slots, Geoffrey Summerhayes
  • Re: accessing unspecified slots, M Jared Finder
    • Re: accessing unspecified slots, Eric Lavigne
  • Re: accessing unspecified slots, Kenny Tilton
  • Re: accessing unspecified slots, Rainer Joswig
• [OT] What happened to slashdot?, Ron Garret
  • Re: [OT] What happened to slashdot?, Eli Gottlieb
    • Re: [OT] What happened to slashdot?, Ron Garret
• Re: Games and Lisp revisited, Adrian Kubala
• PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, Peter Seibel
  • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, William Bland
    • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, bradb
      • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, Kenny Tilton
  • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, tichy
  • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, Paolo Amoroso
  • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, Emre Sevinc
    • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, Peter Seibel
      • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, Edi Weitz
      • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, Julian Stecklina
      • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, Ed Symanzik
      • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, spartyzik
      • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, lin8080
      • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, verec
      • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, Peter Seibel
      • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, Dan Corkill
      • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, Larry Clapp
      • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, Peter Herth
      • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, LuisGLopez
      • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, Peter Herth
      • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, codyk........@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, Peter Seibel
  • Message not available
    • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, Peter Seibel
      • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, Coby Beck
      • Re: PCL in the Jolt Awards finals!, verec
• O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., Kenny Tilton
  • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., funkyj
    • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., Kenny Tilton
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., jayessay
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., jayessay
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., Steven E. Harris
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., Jens Axel Søgaard
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., Jens Axel Søgaard
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., Peter Seibel
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., Edi Weitz
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., Peter Seibel
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., Bruce Baker
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., Steven E. Harris
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., Steven E. Harris
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., Paolo Amoroso
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., Cor Gest
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., Peter Seibel
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., Cor Gest
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., Bob Felts
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., Peter Seibel
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., Kenny Tilton
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., RobPratte
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., Cor Gest
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., Michael Sullivan
      • Re: O'Reilly Lisp? Looks like it is just a matter of time..., Jeremy Smith
• Most efficient way of adding to a list?, dpapathanasiou
  • Re: Most efficient way of adding to a list?, Tayssir John Gabbour
    • Re: Most efficient way of adding to a list?, Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: Most efficient way of adding to a list?, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Most efficient way of adding to a list?, Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: Most efficient way of adding to a list?, Thomas A. Russ
  • Re: Most efficient way of adding to a list?, pkhuong
  • Re: Most efficient way of adding to a list?, jayessay
    • Re: Most efficient way of adding to a list?, dpapathanasiou
      • Re: Most efficient way of adding to a list?, Wade Humeniuk
      • Re: Most efficient way of adding to a list?, Tayssir John Gabbour
      • Re: Most efficient way of adding to a list?, jayessay
      • Re: Most efficient way of adding to a list?, verec
      • Re: Most efficient way of adding to a list?, Brian Downing
      • Re: Most efficient way of adding to a list?, Edi Weitz
      • Re: Most efficient way of adding to a list?, verec
      • Re: Most efficient way of adding to a list?, jayessay
      • Re: Most efficient way of adding to a list?, Tim X
      • Re: Most efficient way of adding to a list?, Tim X
  • Re: Most efficient way of adding to a list?, Wade Humeniuk
• Why I *did* switch to Lisp, Jonathon McKitrick
• Why i don't switch to Lisp, beza1e1
  • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Kenny Tilton
    • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, BR
  • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, jayessay
  • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Kaz Kylheku
    • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Robert Uhl
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Kaz Kylheku
    • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Kenny Tilton
    • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Kaz Kylheku
  • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, verec
    • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, jayessay
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, verec
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Coby Beck
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, verec
  • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Pascal Bourguignon
    • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, beza1e1
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Markus Grueneis
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Alan Crowe
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Frank Buss
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Alan Crowe
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Frank Buss
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Tim X
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, BR
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, BR
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, John Thingstad
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Bill Atkins
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Bill Atkins
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, BR
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, André Thieme
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, John Thingstad
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, BR
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, John Thingstad
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Tim X
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, John Thingstad
  • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Bill Atkins
  • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Frank Buss
    • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Larry Clapp
  • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Thomas F. Burdick
    • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, Harald Hanche-Olsen
  • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, André Thieme
    • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, beza1e1
      • Re: Why i don't switch to Lisp, André Thieme
• When to use apply, Jonathon McKitrick
  • Re: When to use apply, josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: When to use apply, Pascal Bourguignon
    • Found a place my code needs apply, Jonathon McKitrick
      • Re: Found a place my code needs apply, André Thieme
      • Re: Found a place my code needs apply, Jonathon McKitrick
      • Re: Found a place my code needs apply, Coby Beck
      • Re: Found a place my code needs apply, André Thieme
      • Re: Found a place my code needs apply, Pascal Bourguignon
  • Re: When to use apply, jayessay
  • Re: When to use apply, Kaz Kylheku
    • Re: When to use apply, tichy
      • Re: When to use apply, Brian Downing
  • Re: When to use apply, André Thieme
    • Re: When to use apply, Michael Price
    • Re: When to use apply, funkyj
      • Re: When to use apply, Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: When to use apply, André Thieme
      • Re: When to use apply, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: When to use apply, funkyj
      • Re: When to use apply, Coby Beck
      • Re: When to use apply, Wade Humeniuk
      • Re: When to use apply, Coby Beck
      • Re: When to use apply, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: When to use apply, funkyj
      • Re: When to use apply, Coby Beck
      • Re: When to use apply, Wade Humeniuk
      • Re: When to use apply, funkyj
      • Re: When to use apply, André Thieme
      • Re: When to use apply, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: When to use apply, drewc
• Common Lisp version of Scheme code in CS book, Panos C. Lekkas
  • Re: Common Lisp version of Scheme code in CS book, Eli Gottlieb
    • Re: Common Lisp version of Scheme code in CS book, Ulrich Hobelmann
• Feedback on Lispbox, Tony
• Playing around with CFFI and Qt4, lispolos
  • Re: Playing around with CFFI and Qt4, lispolos
    • Re: Playing around with CFFI and Qt4, C Y
• Dynamic function bindings, Stefan Kamphausen
  • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Edi Weitz
    • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
    • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Pascal Costanza
  • Re: Dynamic function bindings, David Sletten
  • Re: Dynamic function bindings, verec
    • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, verec
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Ron Garret
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, verec
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Ron Garret
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, verec
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, verec
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Coby Beck
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, verec
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Coby Beck
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, verec
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, John Thingstad
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, verec
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Coby Beck
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Rob Warnock
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, verec
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Rob Warnock
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, verec
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Stefan Kamphausen
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Rob Warnock
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, jayessay
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Joe Marshall
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Joe Marshall
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Ron Garret
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, verec
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, jayessay
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Ron Garret
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, verec
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Ron Garret
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, verec
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, verec
  • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Michael Price
    • Re: Dynamic function bindings, verec
      • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Geoffrey Summerhayes
  • Re: Dynamic function bindings, Ivan Boldyrev
• only 2 simple questions : a newbie, arnuld
  • Re: only 2 simple questions : a newbie, Leif Dyvik
    • Re: only 2 simple questions : a newbie, Wade Humeniuk
  • Re: only 2 simple questions : a newbie, Eric Lavigne
    • Re: only 2 simple questions : a newbie, Eric Lavigne
      • Re: only 2 simple questions : a newbie, justinhj
      • Re: only 2 simple questions : a newbie, Rob Warnock
      • Re: only 2 simple questions : a newbie, codyk........@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: only 2 simple questions : a newbie, Bill Atkins
      • Re: only 2 simple questions : a newbie, codyk........@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: only 2 simple questions : a newbie, Petter Gustad
      • Re: only 2 simple questions : a newbie, Bill Atkins
      • Re: only 2 simple questions : a newbie, Eric Lavigne
      • Re: only 2 simple questions : a newbie, Petter Gustad
      • Re: only 2 simple questions : a newbie, André Thieme
      • Re: only 2 simple questions : a newbie, Eric Lavigne
      • Allegroserve (was Re: only 2 simple questions : a newbie), Petter Gustad
      • Re: only 2 simple questions : a newbie, John Thingstad
      • Re: only 2 simple questions : a newbie, Eric Lavigne
      • Re: only 2 simple questions : a newbie, John Thingstad
      • Re: only 2 simple questions : a newbie, Eric Lavigne
  • Re: only 2 simple questions : a newbie, Peter Seibel
    • Re: only 2 simple questions : a newbie, drewc
  • Re: only 2 simple questions : a newbie, codyk........@xxxxxxxxx
• SBCL on WIN32, Lisper
  • Re: SBCL on WIN32, Tony
    • Re: SBCL on WIN32, Bernd Schmitt
    • Re: SBCL on WIN32, Leif Dyvik
      • Re: SBCL on WIN32, Edi Weitz
      • Re: SBCL on WIN32, Leif Dyvik
      • Re: SBCL on WIN32, Karol Skocik
      • Re: SBCL on WIN32, Christophe Rhodes
      • Re: SBCL on WIN32, Frank Buss
• Is it possible to define a function w/in a macro as (defun some-fn-name-,param)?, Kevin T. Ryan
  • Re: Is it possible to define a function w/in a macro as (defun some-fn-name-,param)?, Coby Beck
  • Re: Is it possible to define a function w/in a macro as (defun some-fn-name-,param)?, Stephen Compall
    • Re: Is it possible to define a function w/in a macro as (defun some-fn-name-,param)?, kevin . t . ryan
• :test #'something-specific, Carl Taylor
  • Re: :test #'something-specific, Edi Weitz
  • Re: :test #'something-specific, Coby Beck
  • Re: :test #'something-specific, Peter Seibel
• Stylistic Preferences, Paul Griffioen
  • Re: Stylistic Preferences, William D Clinger
  • Re: Stylistic Preferences, pkhuong
  • Re: Stylistic Preferences, Mikalai
    • Re: Stylistic Preferences, William D Clinger
      • Re: Stylistic Preferences, Pascal Costanza
    • Re: Stylistic Preferences, mmcconnell17704
      • Re: Stylistic Preferences, Gareth McCaughan
    • Re: Stylistic Preferences, Joe Marshall
      • Re: Stylistic Preferences, Paul Griffioen
      • Re: Stylistic Preferences, John Thingstad
  • Re: Stylistic Preferences, John Thingstad
    • Re: Stylistic Preferences, Christophe Rhodes
      • Re: Stylistic Preferences, John Thingstad
      • Re: Stylistic Preferences, Christophe Rhodes
      • Re: Stylistic Preferences, Paolo Amoroso
      • Re: Stylistic Preferences, John Thingstad
      • Re: Stylistic Preferences, Christophe Rhodes
      • Re: Stylistic Preferences, John Thingstad
      • Re: Stylistic Preferences, josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Stylistic Preferences, John Thingstad
    • Re: Stylistic Preferences, josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Stylistic Preferences, josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Stylistic Preferences, John Thingstad
      • Re: Stylistic Preferences, josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Stylistic Preferences, josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
• [ANN] Closer Project: New Releases, Pascal Costanza
  • Re: [ANN] Closer Project: New Releases, drewc
    • Re: [ANN] Closer Project: New Releases, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: [ANN] Closer Project: New Releases, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: [ANN] Closer Project: New Releases, drewc
      • Re: [ANN] Closer Project: New Releases, Pascal Costanza
• Error on compling slime, OrangeCap
  • Re: Error on compling slime, Christophe Rhodes
    • Re: Error on compling slime, OrangeCap
      • Re: Error on compling slime, Juho Snellman
      • Re: Error on compling slime, OrangeCap
      • Re: Error on compling slime, Juho Snellman
      • Re: Error on compling slime, OrangeCap
      • Re: Error on compling slime, OrangeCap
• set like table, xbunny
  • Re: set like table, Wade Humeniuk
    • Re: set like table, Wade Humeniuk
      • Re: set like table, xbunny
      • Re: set like table, Wade Humeniuk
      • Re: set like table, R. Mattes
      • Re: set like table, R. Mattes
      • Re: set like table, R. Mattes
      • Re: set like table, xbunny
      • Re: set like table, R. Mattes
      • Re: set like table, Peter Seibel
  • Re: set like table - no sorry map like!, xbunny
  • Re: set like table, Pascal Bourguignon
    • Re: set like table, xbunny
    • Re: set like table, xbunny
      • Re: set like table, Pascal Bourguignon
• your .emacs config file, Karol Skocik
  • Re: your .emacs config file, Babar K. Zafar
  • Re: your .emacs config file, Pascal Bourguignon
    • Re: your .emacs config file, Sean Sieger
      • Re: your .emacs config file, Pascal Bourguignon
  • Re: your .emacs config file, senator
    • Re: your .emacs config file, Karol Skocik
      • Re: your .emacs config file, Leif Dyvik
      • Re: your .emacs config file, Adrian Kubala
• Yahoo, Sony buy LISP convert to C/C++, Geoffrey King
  • Re: Yahoo, Sony buy LISP convert to C/C++, Frank Buss
    • Re: Yahoo, Sony buy LISP convert to C/C++, funkyj
    • Re: Yahoo, Sony buy LISP convert to C/C++, Marco Antoniotti
  • Re: Yahoo, Sony buy LISP convert to C/C++, Kaz Kylheku
    • Re: Yahoo, Sony buy LISP convert to C/C++, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Yahoo, Sony buy LISP convert to C/C++, William Bland
• LISP Rock...big time!!!, OrangeCap
  • Re: LISP Rock...big time!!!, Pascal Costanza
• Need help designing a closure properly, Jonathon McKitrick
  • Re: Need help designing a closure properly, Wade Humeniuk
  • Re: Need help designing a closure properly, Pascal Bourguignon
    • Re: Need help designing a closure properly, Jonathon McKitrick
      • Re: Need help designing a closure properly, Panos C. Lekkas
      • Re: Need help designing a closure properly, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Need help designing a closure properly, Johan Bockgård
      • Re: Need help designing a closure properly, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Need help designing a closure properly, Jonathon McKitrick
      • Re: Need help designing a closure properly, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Need help designing a closure properly, Coby Beck
      • Re: Need help designing a closure properly, Thomas A. Russ
  • Re: Need help designing a closure properly, jayessay
  • Re: Need help designing a closure properly, RPG
• Re: Naggum Sighted..., Frank Goenninger DG1SBG
  • Re: Naggum Sighted..., verec
    • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Zach Beane
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., verec
    • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Kenny Tilton
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., verec
      • Message not available
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., jayessay
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Sam Steingold
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., jayessay
      • Message not available
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Sam Steingold
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Tim X
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Förster vom Silberwald
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Tim X
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Sam Steingold
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., jayessay
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Sam Steingold
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., jayessay
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Coby Beck
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., jayessay
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Ron Garret
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., William D Clinger
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Gareth McCaughan
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Coby Beck
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Tim X
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Kaz Kylheku
    • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Frank Goenninger DG1SBG
    • Re: Naggum Sighted..., alex . gman
  • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Tayssir John Gabbour
    • Re: Naggum Sighted..., verec
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Tayssir John Gabbour
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Tim X
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Larry Clapp
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Christian Lynbech
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Jens Axel Søgaard
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Förster vom Silberwald
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Tim X
      • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Kaz Kylheku
    • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Frank Goenninger DG1SBG
  • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Joe Marshall
    • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Sam Steingold
    • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Christopher Browne
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Naggum Sighted..., Fernando Rodríguez
• newbie question - designator [coercion], Florian Leitner
  • Re: newbie question - designator [coercion], Jason Kantz
    • Re: newbie question - designator [coercion], Florian Leitner
  • Re: newbie question - designator [coercion], tichy
    • Re: newbie question - designator [coercion], Florian Leitner
      • Re: newbie question - designator [coercion], Jason Kantz
  • Re: newbie question - designator [coercion], David Sletten
    • Re: newbie question - designator [coercion], Florian Leitner
      • Re: newbie question - designator [coercion], David Sletten
      • Re: newbie question - designator [coercion], Florian Leitner
      • Re: newbie question - designator [coercion], Coby Beck
      • Re: newbie question - designator [coercion], Florian Leitner
  • Re: newbie question - designator [coercion], Barry Margolin
• Newbie: switching between REPL and source in Slime, Trastabuga
  • Re: Newbie: switching between REPL and source in Slime, Florian Leitner
    • Re: Newbie: switching between REPL and source in Slime, David Trudgett
  • Re: Newbie: switching between REPL and source in Slime, tichy
• Re: Concentration in OCaml, Benedikt Rosenau
• sbcl networking, Karol Skocik
  • Re: sbcl networking, Zach Beane
    • Re: sbcl networking, Karol Skocik
      • Re: sbcl networking, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: sbcl networking, Karol Skocik
      • Re: sbcl networking, Rob Warnock
      • Re: sbcl networking, Karol Skocik
      • Re: sbcl networking, Rob Warnock
      • Re: sbcl networking, Zach Beane
      • Re: sbcl networking, Rob Warnock
      • Re: sbcl networking, Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: sbcl networking, Joerg Hoehle
      • Re: sbcl networking, Rob Warnock
      • Re: sbcl networking, Cameron MacKinnon
  • Re: sbcl networking, André Thieme
• Announcement Study Group "Essentials of Programming Languages", bobueland
• Works on LispWorks but not on CLISP, konane
  • Re: Works on LispWorks but not on CLISP, R. Mattes
  • Re: Works on LispWorks but not on CLISP, Eric Lavigne
    • Re: Works on LispWorks but not on CLISP, konane
      • Re: Works on LispWorks but not on CLISP, David Sletten
      • Re: Works on LispWorks but not on CLISP, Thomas A. Russ
      • Re: Works on LispWorks but not on CLISP, Geoffrey Summerhayes
      • Re: Works on LispWorks but not on CLISP, konane
      • Re: Works on LispWorks but not on CLISP, Eric Lavigne
      • Re: Works on LispWorks but not on CLISP, Peter Seibel
      • Re: Works on LispWorks but not on CLISP, Geoffrey Summerhayes
    • Re: Works on LispWorks but not on CLISP, mmcconnell17704
  • Re: Works on LispWorks but not on CLISP, Pascal Bourguignon
    • Re: Works on LispWorks but not on CLISP, konane
    • Re: Works on LispWorks but not on CLISP, Sam Steingold
      • Re: Works on LispWorks but not on CLISP, mmcconnell17704
      • Re: Works on LispWorks but not on CLISP, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Works on LispWorks but not on CLISP, Barry Margolin
• ASDF reflection, John Thingstad
• common-lisp.net down, Erik Enge
  • Re: common-lisp.net down, Erik Enge
• markup languages and webdesigners, Jonathan Heusser
  • Re: markup languages and webdesigners, Petter Gustad
  • Re: markup languages and webdesigners, Rob Warnock
• YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, John Connors
  • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Eric Lavigne
  • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Pascal Bourguignon
    • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Tayssir John Gabbour
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Tayssir John Gabbour
    • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Peter Seibel
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Coby Beck
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Coby Beck
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Peter Seibel
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, John Thingstad
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Coby Beck
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Joe Marshall
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Ivan Boldyrev
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Duncan Harvey
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Bill Atkins
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Thomas A. Russ
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Bill Atkins
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Tayssir John Gabbour
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Thomas A. Russ
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Ivan Boldyrev
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Thomas A. Russ
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Pascal Bourguignon
  • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Wade Humeniuk
  • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Jason Kantz
    • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, rsheridan6
      • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Jason Kantz
  • Re: YANQ - When to map, when to iterate, when to recurse? And why CLOS?, Thomas A. Russ
• European Common Lisp Meeting 2006, Arthur Lemmens
  • Re: European Common Lisp Meeting 2006, Tayssir John Gabbour
• Problem with Practical Common Lisp + sbcl, Leif Dyvik
  • Re: Problem with Practical Common Lisp + sbcl, Zach Beane
    • Re: Problem with Practical Common Lisp + sbcl, Leif Dyvik
      • Re: Problem with Practical Common Lisp + sbcl, RMC
      • Re: Problem with Practical Common Lisp + sbcl, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Problem with Practical Common Lisp + sbcl, Edi Weitz
      • Re: Problem with Practical Common Lisp + sbcl, RMC
      • Re: Problem with Practical Common Lisp + sbcl, Edi Weitz
      • Re: Problem with Practical Common Lisp + sbcl, Ivan Boldyrev
• Would kill-sexp-save be useful?, Jonathon McKitrick
  • Re: Would kill-sexp-save be useful?, Jason Kantz
    • Re: Would kill-sexp-save be useful?, Jonathon McKitrick
  • Re: Would kill-sexp-save be useful?, Timofei Shatrov
    • Re: Would kill-sexp-save be useful?, senator
      • Re: Would kill-sexp-save be useful?, Thomas A. Russ
      • Re: Would kill-sexp-save be useful?, senator
      • Re: Would kill-sexp-save be useful?, Johan Bockgård
    • Re: Would kill-sexp-save be useful?, Jonathon McKitrick
• Parser generator or parse support libraries for Common Lisp, MichaelNedzelsky@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Parser generator or parse support libraries for Common Lisp, Edi Weitz
  • Re: Parser generator or parse support libraries for Common Lisp, Dave Baum
• INTERN hygiene in Web applications, Ivan Shvedunov
  • Re: INTERN hygiene in Web applications, Wade Humeniuk
    • Re: INTERN hygiene in Web applications, Wade Humeniuk
  • Re: INTERN hygiene in Web applications, Adam Warner
    • Re: INTERN hygiene in Web applications, Wade Humeniuk
      • Re: INTERN hygiene in Web applications, Rob Warnock
      • Re: INTERN hygiene in Web applications, Joerg Hoehle
      • Re: INTERN hygiene in Web applications, Rob Warnock
      • Re: INTERN hygiene in Web applications, Thomas A. Russ
      • Re: INTERN hygiene in Web applications, Juho Snellman
    • Re: INTERN hygiene in Web applications, Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: INTERN hygiene in Web applications, Adam Warner
      • Re: INTERN hygiene in Web applications, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
      • Re: INTERN hygiene in Web applications, Adam Warner
• {Historical} Lisp 'manually' compiled to assembly, Minti
  • Re: {Historical} Lisp 'manually' compiled to assembly, Peter Seibel
    • Re: {Historical} Lisp 'manually' compiled to assembly, Coby Beck
      • Re: {Historical} Lisp 'manually' compiled to assembly, Ulrich Hobelmann
  • Re: {Historical} Lisp 'manually' compiled to assembly, Pascal Bourguignon
    • Re: {Historical} Lisp 'manually' compiled to assembly, Ivan Boldyrev
  • Re: {Historical} Lisp 'manually' compiled to assembly, Tin Gherdanarra
    • Re: {Historical} Lisp 'manually' compiled to assembly, Minti
      • Re: {Historical} Lisp 'manually' compiled to assembly, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: {Historical} Lisp 'manually' compiled to assembly, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: {Historical} Lisp 'manually' compiled to assembly, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: {Historical} Lisp 'manually' compiled to assembly, Rob Warnock
      • Re: {Historical} Lisp 'manually' compiled to assembly, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: {Historical} Lisp 'manually' compiled to assembly, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: {Historical} Lisp 'manually' compiled to assembly, Thomas F. Burdick
• Is there an eval-1 function somewhere ?, Didier Verna
  • Re: Is there an eval-1 function somewhere ?, Barry Margolin
    • Re: Is there an eval-1 function somewhere ?, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Is there an eval-1 function somewhere ?, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Is there an eval-1 function somewhere ?, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Is there an eval-1 function somewhere ?, Tayssir John Gabbour
      • Re: Is there an eval-1 function somewhere ?, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Is there an eval-1 function somewhere ?, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Is there an eval-1 function somewhere ?, (typep 'nil '(satisfies identity)) => ?
      • Re: Is there an eval-1 function somewhere ?, Didier Verna
  • Re: Is there an eval-1 function somewhere ?, Kaz Kylheku
    • Re: Is there an eval-1 function somewhere ?, Wade Humeniuk
• Argument checking, John
  • Message not available
    • Re: Argument checking, Pascal Bourguignon
  • Re: Argument checking, Majorinc , Kazimir
    • Re: Argument checking, John Thingstad
      • Re: Argument checking, John Thingstad
      • Re: Argument checking, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: Argument checking, Ulrich Hobelmann
    • Re: Argument checking, Joe Marshall
      • Re: Argument checking, Majorinc , Kazimir
  • Re: Argument checking, Jason Kantz
  • Re: Argument checking, Wade Humeniuk
  • Re: Argument checking, Joe Marshall
• Clisp, FFI and SDL - trying to pass in a union to be filled, Jeremy Smith
  • Re: Clisp, FFI and SDL - trying to pass in a union to be filled, Eric Lavigne
    • Re: Clisp, FFI and SDL - trying to pass in a union to be filled, Jeremy Smith
      • Re: Clisp, FFI and SDL - trying to pass in a union to be filled, Edi Weitz
  • Re: Clisp, FFI and SDL - trying to pass in a union to be filled, Edi Weitz
  • Re: Clisp, FFI and SDL - trying to pass in a union to be filled, Luke J Crook
    • Re: Clisp, FFI and SDL - trying to pass in a union to be filled, Jeremy Smith
      • Re: Clisp, FFI and SDL - trying to pass in a union to be filled, Edi Weitz
      • Re: Clisp, FFI and SDL - trying to pass in a union to be filled, Luke J Crook
  • Re: Clisp, FFI and SDL - trying to pass in a union to be filled, Frank Buss
• Unit Test Framework, Tony
  • Re: Unit Test Framework, Eric Lavigne
    • Re: Unit Test Framework, Brian Downing
  • Re: Unit Test Framework, RPG
  • Re: Unit Test Framework, M Jared Finder
    • Re: Unit Test Framework, Pascal Bourguignon
  • Re: Unit Test Framework, Thomas F. Burdick
  • Re: Unit Test Framework, Larry Clapp
• trivial-ldap v0.5 -- native cl LDAP client., kevin montuori
• making classes and functions available to other programs and libraries., levicc00123@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: making classes and functions available to other programs and libraries., Eric Lavigne
    • Re: making classes and functions available to other programs and libraries., levicc00123@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: making classes and functions available to other programs and libraries., Kenny Tilton
      • Re: making classes and functions available to other programs and libraries., levicc00123@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: making classes and functions available to other programs and libraries., Thomas A. Russ
• SLIME is MIA, OrangeCap
  • Re: SLIME is MIA, Tolstoy
  • Re: SLIME is MIA, Edi Weitz
    • Re: SLIME is MIA, OrangeCap
      • Re: SLIME is MIA, Edi Weitz
      • Re: SLIME is MIA, Edi Weitz
• request for help with macro, RPG
  • Re: request for help with macro, Barry Margolin
  • Re: request for help with macro, Thomas F. Burdick
    • Re: request for help with macro, RPG
    • Re: request for help with macro, Fred Gilham
      • Re: request for help with macro, RPG
• Equivalent of C's "global/static" variables, bradb
  • Re: Equivalent of C's "global/static" variables, jayessay
  • Re: Equivalent of C's "global/static" variables, Kenny Tilton
  • Re: Equivalent of C's "global/static" variables, Brian Downing
    • Re: Equivalent of C's "global/static" variables, bradb
    • Re: Equivalent of C's "global/static" variables, Duane Rettig
      • Re: Equivalent of C's "global/static" variables, Brian Downing
      • Re: Equivalent of C's "global/static" variables, Duane Rettig
      • Re: Equivalent of C's "global/static" variables, Christophe Rhodes
      • Re: Equivalent of C's "global/static" variables, Duane Rettig
      • Re: Equivalent of C's "global/static" variables, Rob Warnock
      • Re: Equivalent of C's "global/static" variables, jayessay
• ELUG Meeting in Hamburg?, Christian Lynbech
  • Re: ELUG Meeting in Hamburg?, Edi Weitz
• Lisp is Sin, Adam Connor
  • Re: Lisp is Sin, Pascal Costanza
    • Re: Lisp is Sin, Coby Beck
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, BR
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Bruce Stephens
  • Re: Lisp is Sin, Wade Humeniuk
    • Re: Lisp is Sin, Adam Connor
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Wade Humeniuk
  • Re: Lisp is Sin, Cameron MacKinnon
    • Re: Lisp is Sin, Adam Connor
  • Re: Lisp is Sin, Joe Marshall
  • Re: Lisp is Sin, jayessay
  • Re: Lisp is Sin, Alan Crowe
  • Re: Lisp is Sin, Paolo Amoroso
    • Re: Lisp is Sin, Pascal Costanza
  • Re: Lisp is Sin, Majorinc , Kazimir
    • Re: Lisp is Sin, Zach Beane
    • Re: Lisp is Sin, Dan Corkill
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Sin in Lisp, Re: Lisp is Sin, Richard J. Fateman
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Kenny Tilton
    • Re: Lisp is Sin, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Adam Connor
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Geoffrey S. Knauth
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Tayssir John Gabbour
    • Re: Lisp is Sin, Marco Antoniotti
    • Re: Lisp is Sin, Coby Beck
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Duane Rettig
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Greg Menke
    • Re: Lisp is Sin, Sam Steingold
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, David Trudgett
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Bruce Hoult
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Tayssir John Gabbour
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, PCL
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Joe Marshall
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, BR
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, drewc
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, BR
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, David Trudgett
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, David Trudgett
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, BR
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, David Trudgett
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Tim X
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, David Trudgett
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Tim X
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, BR
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, David Trudgett
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, David Trudgett
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Tim X
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Fred Gilham
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, David Trudgett
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Tim X
      • Message not available
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Message not available
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, BR
      • Message not available
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, BR
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Edi Weitz
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Tayssir John Gabbour
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Peter Herth
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Bruce Hoult
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Edi Weitz
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, M Jared Finder
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Bruce Hoult
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Edi Weitz
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, drewc
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, drewc
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, John Thingstad
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Kenny Tilton
      • Message not available
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Kenny Tilton
      • Message not available
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Kenny Tilton
      • Message not available
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Message not available
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Nathan Baum
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, André Thieme
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Tayssir John Gabbour
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Bill Atkins
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Tayssir John Gabbour
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Tayssir John Gabbour
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Nathan Baum
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Bill Atkins
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Nathan Baum
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, vedm
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, BR
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, verec
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Bill Atkins
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Harald Hanche-Olsen
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, John Thingstad
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, David Golden
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, David Golden
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, David Golden
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Nathan Baum
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Nathan Baum
      • Message not available
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Bill Atkins
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Tayssir John Gabbour
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Tayssir John Gabbour
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, John Thingstad
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, senator
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, lin8080
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Philippe Lorin
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, BR
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Harald Hanche-Olsen
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Tiarnán Ó Corráin
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Pisin Bootvong
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, John Thingstad
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, vedm
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Harald Hanche-Olsen
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Joe Marshall
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Tim X
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, John Thingstad
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Harald Hanche-Olsen
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, John Thingstad
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Nathan Baum
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Bill Atkins
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Nathan Baum
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Nathan Baum
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Nathan Baum
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Nathan Baum
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Nathan Baum
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Edi Weitz
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Christophe Rhodes
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Christophe Rhodes
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, André Thieme
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, drewc
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, David Trudgett
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Panos C. Lekkas
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, David Trudgett
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Panos C. Lekkas
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, David Trudgett
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, drewc
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Panos C. Lekkas
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Panos C. Lekkas
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, David Trudgett
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, drewc
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Coby Beck
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, drewc
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, BR
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, drewc
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, drewc
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Tayssir John Gabbour
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, drewc
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Tayssir John Gabbour
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Tiarnán Ó Corráin
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, David Trudgett
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Tiarnán Ó Corráin
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Bruce Hoult
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, David Trudgett
    • Re: Lisp is Sin, Giorgos Keramidas
  • Re: Lisp is Sin, Kenny Tilton
    • Re: Lisp is Sin, Adam Connor
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Paolo Amoroso
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, jayessay
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Fred Gilham
      • Re: Lisp is Sin, Rob Warnock
  • Re: Lisp is Sin, Nathan Baum
• Re: Another Lisp logo, Edi Weitz
• Help with one benchmark test needed, Majorinc , Kazimir
  • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Kenny Tilton
  • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Pascal Costanza
    • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, verec
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Rainer Joswig
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Rob Thorpe
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Rob Thorpe
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, John Thingstad
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Rob Thorpe
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Thomas A. Russ
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, drewc
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Marco Antoniotti
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Thomas A. Russ
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Rob Thorpe
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Geoffrey Summerhayes
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, verec
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Alan Crowe
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Joe Marshall
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Rob Thorpe
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, André Thieme
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, verec
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, John Thingstad
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, John Thingstad
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Brian Downing
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, verec
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Förster vom Silberwald
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Thomas A. Russ
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, André Thieme
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Thomas A. Russ
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Brian Downing
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Peter Seibel
  • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Pascal Bourguignon
  • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Gareth McCaughan
    • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Gareth McCaughan
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Gareth McCaughan
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Gareth McCaughan
    • Re: Help with one benchmark test needed, Majorinc , Kazimir
• Performance of generic functions, Christian Jullien
  • Re: Performance of generic functions, Marc Battyani
    • Re: Performance of generic functions, André Thieme
    • Re: Performance of generic functions, Christian Jullien
      • Re: Performance of generic functions, Marc Battyani
      • Re: Performance of generic functions, Ivan Boldyrev
  • Re: Performance of generic functions, Pascal Costanza
    • Re: Performance of generic functions, Christian Jullien
      • Re: Performance of generic functions, Pascal Costanza
    • Re: Performance of generic functions, André Thieme
      • Re: Performance of generic functions, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Performance of generic functions, André Thieme
  • Re: Performance of generic functions, Christophe Rhodes
    • Re: Performance of generic functions, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Performance of generic functions, Pieter Breed
      • Re: Performance of generic functions, Christophe Rhodes
  • Re: Performance of generic functions, Bruce Hoult
  • Re: Performance of generic functions, Thomas A. Russ
• cl-blog missing webutils, Julian Stecklina
  • Re: cl-blog missing webutils, Edi Weitz
    • Re: cl-blog missing webutils, Julian Stecklina
• Lisp and low-level operating system development, ramza2
  • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Edi Weitz
  • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Nathan Baum
    • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Troels Henriksen
  • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Pascal Bourguignon
  • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, ramza2
    • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, jladd
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, John Thingstad
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Rob Thorpe
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Rob Thorpe
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Rob Thorpe
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Rob Thorpe
  • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Eli Gottlieb
    • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Tin Gherdanarra
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Nathan Baum
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, funkyj
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Lisp and low-level operating system development, Nathan Baum
• Refining the arch. of my MMORPG high-level-AI/gameplay service?, michael.warnock@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Refining the arch. of my MMORPG high-level-AI/gameplay service?, Kenny Tilton
    • Re: Refining the arch. of my MMORPG high-level-AI/gameplay service?, michael.warnock@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Refining the arch. of my MMORPG high-level-AI/gameplay service?, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Refining the arch. of my MMORPG high-level-AI/gameplay service?, Kenny Tilton
• hoots n hollers with c2lisp, Kenny Tilton
  • Re: hoots n hollers with c2lisp, Jeff M.
    • Re: hoots n hollers with c2lisp, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
      • Re: hoots n hollers with c2lisp, Nathan Baum
      • Re: hoots n hollers with c2lisp, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: hoots n hollers with c2lisp, Nathan Baum
  • Re: hoots n hollers with c2lisp, John Thingstad
    • Re: hoots n hollers with c2lisp, John Thingstad
      • Omigod! [was Re: hoots n hollers with c2lisp], Kenny Tilton
      • Re: hoots n hollers with c2lisp, Rob Warnock
      • Re: hoots n hollers with c2lisp, John Thingstad
      • Re: hoots n hollers with c2lisp, Rob Warnock
      • Re: hoots n hollers with c2lisp, Joerg Hoehle
      • Re: hoots n hollers with c2lisp, John Thingstad
    • Re: hoots n hollers with c2lisp, Gareth McCaughan
      • Re: hoots n hollers with c2lisp, John Thingstad
  • Re: hoots n hollers with c2lisp, John Thingstad
    • Re: hoots n hollers with c2lisp, Joerg Hoehle
      • Re: hoots n hollers with c2lisp, John Thingstad
• tagbody mystery, Kenny Tilton
  • Re: tagbody mystery, tichy
  • Re: tagbody mystery, tichy
  • Re: tagbody mystery, Geoffrey Summerhayes
    • Re: tagbody mystery, Geoffrey Summerhayes
      • Re: tagbody mystery, Kenny Tilton
  • Re: tagbody mystery, tichy
    • Re: tagbody mystery, Kenny Tilton
  • Re: tagbody mystery, M Jared Finder
  • Re: tagbody mystery, Brian Downing
    • Re: tagbody mystery, Thomas F. Burdick
    • Re: tagbody mystery, Joe Marshall
      • Re: tagbody mystery, Kenny Tilton
    • Re: tagbody mystery, André Thieme
      • Re: tagbody mystery, Brian Downing
• Re: Documenting Idioms(was: Do I have to be an expert to get performance: CL versus Perl), Tim X
• Lisp Job at SRI, Edi Weitz
• Did LISP 1.5 do tail-call optimization?, Karl A. Krueger
  • Re: Did LISP 1.5 do tail-call optimization?, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
    • Re: Did LISP 1.5 do tail-call optimization?, Karl A. Krueger
  • Re: Did LISP 1.5 do tail-call optimization?, Pascal Bourguignon
• newbie take: what Lisp's lists are good at, verec
  • Re: newbie take: what Lisp's lists are good at, Ulrich Hobelmann
    • Re: newbie take: what Lisp's lists are good at, verec
      • Re: newbie take: what Lisp's lists are good at, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: newbie take: what Lisp's lists are good at, verec
      • Re: newbie take: what Lisp's lists are good at, Edi Weitz
      • Re: newbie take: what Lisp's lists are good at, verec
      • Re: newbie take: what Lisp's lists are good at, John Thingstad
      • Re: newbie take: what Lisp's lists are good at, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: newbie take: what Lisp's lists are good at, Kenny Tilton
  • Re: newbie take: what Lisp's lists are good at, Jens Axel Søgaard
    • Re: newbie take: what Lisp's lists are good at, verec
  • Re: newbie take: what Lisp's lists are good at, Brian Downing
    • Re: newbie take: what Lisp's lists are good at, Brian Downing
    • Re: newbie take: what Lisp's lists are good at, verec
      • Re: newbie take: what Lisp's lists are good at, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: newbie take: what Lisp's lists are good at, verec
      • Re: newbie take: what Lisp's lists are good at, Pascal Bourguignon
  • Re: newbie take: what Lisp's lists are good at, Bill Atkins
    • Re: newbie take: what Lisp's lists are good at, verec
  • Re: newbie take: what Lisp's lists are good at, Christopher Browne
    • Re: newbie take: what Lisp's lists are good at, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: newbie take: what Lisp's lists are good at, verec
      • Re: newbie take: what Lisp's lists are good at, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: newbie take: what Lisp's lists are good at, Frédéric Jolliton
• Will LISP Help My Resume ?, Techie Bill
  • Re: Will LISP Help My Resume ?, Edi Weitz
    • Re: Will LISP Help My Resume ?, Troels Henriksen
      • Re: Will LISP Help My Resume ?, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Will LISP Help My Resume ?, Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: Will LISP Help My Resume ?, Sylvain
      • Re: Will LISP Help My Resume ?, Joe Marshall
  • Re: Will LISP Help My Resume ?, Kenny Tilton
    • Re: Will LISP Help My Resume ?, Techie Bill
      • Re: Will LISP Help My Resume ?, Artie Gold
      • Re: Will LISP Help My Resume ?, Paolo Amoroso
  • Re: Will LISP Help My Resume ?, Christopher Browne
  • Re: Will LISP Help My Resume ?, Tin Gherdanarra
• How to balance parentheses in SLIME??, Jonathon McKitrick
  • Re: How to balance parentheses in SLIME??, Scott Bell
    • Re: How to balance parentheses in SLIME??, Thomas F. Burdick
  • Re: How to balance parentheses in SLIME??, Ulrich Hobelmann
    • Re: How to balance parentheses in SLIME??, Ivan Boldyrev
  • Re: How to balance parentheses in SLIME??, Pascal Costanza
• How to approach logic bugs, Jonathon McKitrick
  • Re: How to approach logic bugs, Kenny Tilton
  • Re: How to approach logic bugs, Michael Price
  • Re: How to approach logic bugs, Gareth McCaughan
    • Re: How to approach logic bugs, Raffael Cavallaro
      • Re: How to approach logic bugs, Gareth McCaughan
  • Re: How to approach logic bugs, David Sletten
• What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Majorinc , Kazimir
  • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Edi Weitz
  • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Wade Humeniuk
    • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Wade Humeniuk
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Giorgos Keramidas
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Zach Beane
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Giorgos Keramidas
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Tayssir John Gabbour
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Giorgos Keramidas
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), pkhuong
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Geoffrey Summerhayes
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Zach Beane
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Geoffrey Summerhayes
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Pascal Costanza
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Gareth McCaughan
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Peter Seibel
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Russell McManus
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Edi Weitz
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Russell McManus
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Edi Weitz
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Pisin Bootvong
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Russell McManus
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), jayessay
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Russell McManus
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Pisin Bootvong
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Stefan Nobis
      • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Kaz Kylheku
  • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Ulrich Hobelmann
  • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Pascal Bourguignon
  • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), nallen05
  • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), verec
  • Re: What to do with (time (length L)) proportional to (length L), Pascal Costanza
• Should I have bought an iBook for Lisp instead?, Jonathon McKitrick
  • Re: Should I have bought an iBook for Lisp instead?, Espen Vestre
    • Re: Should I have bought an iBook for Lisp instead?, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Should I have bought an iBook for Lisp instead?, Paolo Amoroso
      • Re: Should I have bought an iBook for Lisp instead?, Edi Weitz
      • Re: Should I have bought an iBook for Lisp instead?, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Should I have bought an iBook for Lisp instead?, Edi Weitz
      • Re: Should I have bought an iBook for Lisp instead?, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Should I have bought an iBook for Lisp instead?, Förster vom Silberwald
      • Re: Should I have bought an iBook for Lisp instead?, Edi Weitz
      • Re: Should I have bought an iBook for Lisp instead?, Raffael Cavallaro
      • Re: Should I have bought an iBook for Lisp instead?, Michael Price
      • Re: Should I have bought an iBook for Lisp instead?, Bruce Hoult
      • Re: Should I have bought an iBook for Lisp instead?, Sylvain
      • Re: Should I have bought an iBook for Lisp instead?, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Message not available
      • Re: Should I have bought an iBook for Lisp instead?, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Should I have bought an iBook for Lisp instead?, Espen Vestre
      • Re: Should I have bought an iBook for Lisp instead?, Pascal Bourguignon
    • Re: Should I have bought an iBook for Lisp instead?, Greg Menke
      • Re: Should I have bought an iBook for Lisp instead?, Espen Vestre
  • Re: Should I have bought an iBook for Lisp instead?, Edi Weitz
  • Re: Should I have bought an iBook for Lisp instead?, Ulrich Hobelmann
  • Re: Should I have bought an iBook for Lisp instead?, verec
  • Re: Should I have bought an iBook for Lisp instead?, alex . gman
• Macro does not know gobal variable, Heiko Schaefer
  • Re: Macro does not know gobal variable, André Thieme
  • Re: Macro does not know gobal variable, Edi Weitz
  • Re: Macro does not know gobal variable, Espen Vestre
    • Re: Macro does not know gobal variable, Edi Weitz
      • Re: Macro does not know gobal variable, Espen Vestre
      • Re: Macro does not know gobal variable, Heiko Schaefer
      • Re: Macro does not know gobal variable, Edi Weitz
      • Re: Macro does not know gobal variable, Heiko Schaefer
      • Re: Macro does not know gobal variable, Espen Vestre
      • Re: Macro does not know gobal variable, Barry Margolin
  • Re: Macro does not know gobal variable, Kenny Tilton
    • Re: Macro does not know gobal variable, Heiko Schaefer
      • Re: Macro does not know gobal variable, Kenny Tilton
  • Re: Macro does not know gobal variable, Stefan Nobis
  • Re: Macro does not know gobal variable, Pascal Bourguignon
• Huge hairy clauses and macro sytnax abstraction., John Connors
  • Re: Huge hairy clauses and macro sytnax abstraction., Kenny Tilton
    • Re: Huge hairy clauses and macro sytnax abstraction., John Connors
  • Re: Huge hairy clauses and macro sytnax abstraction., Larry Clapp
• Tags filtering added to the Common Lisp Directory, Marc Battyani
  • Re: Tags filtering added to the Common Lisp Directory, Marc Battyani
• Examples of web apps using UCW and/or LoL?, Jonathon McKitrick
  • Re: Examples of web apps using UCW and/or LoL?, carlos . ungil
• Compiling ECL (embeddable common lisp) with MinGW, Steve
  • Re: Compiling ECL (embeddable common lisp) with MinGW, retupmoca
    • Re: Compiling ECL (embeddable common lisp) with MinGW, Frank Buss
    • Re: Compiling ECL (embeddable common lisp) with MinGW, Pascal Bourguignon
  • Re: Compiling ECL (embeddable common lisp) with MinGW, Juanjo
• Looking for linear algebra lib, Paul Griffioen
  • Re: Looking for linear algebra lib, Sam Steingold
    • Re: Looking for linear algebra lib, Paul Griffioen
      • Re: Looking for linear algebra lib, josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Looking for linear algebra lib, Paul Griffioen
  • Re: Looking for linear algebra lib, josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Looking for linear algebra lib, Thomas A. Russ
  • Re: Looking for linear algebra lib, Paolo Amoroso
    • Re: Looking for linear algebra lib, Paul Griffioen
      • Re: Looking for linear algebra lib, Paolo Amoroso
      • Re: Looking for linear algebra lib, josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Looking for linear algebra lib, Paul Griffioen
      • Re: Looking for linear algebra lib, John Thingstad
      • Re: Looking for linear algebra lib, rif
      • Re: Looking for linear algebra lib, Robert Dodier
      • Re: Looking for linear algebra lib, Andreas Eder
  • Re: Looking for linear algebra lib, Steven M. Haflich
    • Re: Looking for linear algebra lib, Debian User
    • Re: Looking for linear algebra lib, Robert Dodier
• [CfP] Dynamic Languages Day @ Brussels, Pascal Costanza
• Re: writing a dynamic CLOS proxy, Juanjo
• Common-Lisp.net downtime Saturday Jan 14th., Erik Enge
  • Re: Common-Lisp.net downtime Saturday Jan 14th., Erik Enge
    • Re: Common-Lisp.net downtime Saturday Jan 14th., Erik Enge
      • Re: Common-Lisp.net downtime Saturday Jan 14th., Edi Weitz
      • Re: Common-Lisp.net downtime Saturday Jan 14th., Erik Enge
      • Re: Common-Lisp.net downtime Saturday Jan 14th., Erik Enge
      • Re: Common-Lisp.net downtime Saturday Jan 14th., Erik Enge
• lisp and brain orgasms, casioculture
  • Re: lisp and brain orgasms, Joe Marshall
    • Re: lisp and brain orgasms, mmcconnell17704
  • Re: lisp and brain orgasms, Paolo Amoroso
  • Re: lisp and brain orgasms, Tin Gherdanarra
• Translate this!, Kenny Tilton
  • Re: Translate this!, John Thingstad
    • Re: Translate this!, RPG
      • Re: Translate this!, John Thingstad
      • Re: Translate this!, Kenny Tilton
    • Re: Translate this!, Kenny Tilton
  • Re: Translate this!, John Thingstad
  • Re: Translate this!, Pascal Bourguignon
    • Re: Translate this!, John Thingstad
    • Re: Translate this!, Kenny Tilton
  • Re: Translate this!, Geoffrey Summerhayes
  • Re: Translate this!, Joe Marshall
    • Re: Translate this!, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Translate this!, Joe Marshall
      • Re: Translate this!, Edi Weitz
      • Re: Translate this!, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Translate this!, Gareth McCaughan
      • Re: Translate this!, Joe Marshall
      • Re: Translate this!, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Translate this!, Joe Marshall
      • Re: Translate this!, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Translate this!, Adrian Kubala
      • Re: Translate this!, Pascal Bourguignon
  • Re: Translate this!, Antonio Menezes Leitao
• Help with saving SBCL image that will connect to SLIME, Jonathon McKitrick
  • Re: Help with saving SBCL image that will connect to SLIME, Zach Beane
• Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, LuisGLopez
  • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, Paolo Amoroso
    • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, LuisGLopez
    • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, Emilio Lopes
    • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, John Thingstad
  • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, Pascal Costanza
    • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, LuisGLopez
    • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, M Jared Finder
      • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, funkyj
  • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, Pascal Bourguignon
    • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, verec
  • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, M Jared Finder
  • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, André Thieme
    • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, LuisGLopez
      • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, verec
      • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, Coby Beck
      • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, pwbdecker
      • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, Edi Weitz
      • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, Joe Marshall
      • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, Nathan Baum
      • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, Joe Marshall
      • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, Nathan Baum
      • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, Joe Marshall
      • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, John Thingstad
      • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, Nathan Baum
      • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, John Thingstad
      • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, Gareth McCaughan
      • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, Jens Kilian
      • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, Fred Gilham
      • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, Johan Bockgård
      • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, Björn Lindberg
      • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, Emilio Lopes
  • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, alex . gman
    • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, Espen Vestre
      • Re: Why '1+' instead of '+1'?, Pascal Costanza
• Macro dependencies, John Thingstad
  • Re: Macro dependencies, John Thingstad
• New Windows/CLISP Lispbox available., Peter Seibel
  • Re: New Windows/CLISP Lispbox available., GB
    • Re: New Windows/CLISP Lispbox available., Peter Seibel
      • Re: New Windows/CLISP Lispbox available., Foo
      • Re: New Windows/CLISP Lispbox available., Peter Seibel
    • Re: New Windows/CLISP Lispbox available., Timofei Shatrov
  • Re: New Windows/CLISP Lispbox available., Joseph Frippiat
    • Re: New Windows/CLISP Lispbox available., Peter Seibel
  • Re: New Windows/CLISP Lispbox available., Timofei Shatrov
    • Re: New Windows/CLISP Lispbox available., Michael
    • Re: New Windows/CLISP Lispbox available., Peter Seibel
  • Re: New Windows/CLISP Lispbox available., funkyj
    • Re: New Windows/CLISP Lispbox available., John Thingstad
    • Re: New Windows/CLISP Lispbox available., Joerg Hoehle
      • Re: New Windows/CLISP Lispbox available., funkyj
  • Re: New Windows/CLISP Lispbox available., lin8080
• New Common Lisp Directory URL encoding, Marc Battyani
• LW "hobbyist pricing", verec
  • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Kenny Tilton
    • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", verec
  • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Cameron MacKinnon
    • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", verec
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Alain Picard
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", John Thingstad
  • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Wade Humeniuk
    • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Herb Martin
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", a
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", justinhj
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", John Thingstad
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Espen Vestre
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Edi Weitz
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Espen Vestre
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Pascal Costanza
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Paul Wallich
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", John Thingstad
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", carlos . ungil
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", John Thingstad
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Espen Vestre
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", newsmailcomp5
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", John Thingstad
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", ji+ns
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", newsmailcomp5
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Lars Brinkhoff
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Thomas A. Russ
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Espen Vestre
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Ray Fink
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Raymond Toy
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Bill Bradford
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", verec
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Pascal Costanza
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Pascal Costanza
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Paul Wallich
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", verec
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Paul Wallich
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", verec
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", justinhj
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", verec
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", justinhj
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Geoffrey Summerhayes
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Friedrich Dominicus
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", John Thingstad
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Paul Wallich
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Michael
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", verec
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Bob Felts
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", verec
      • Message not available
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Bob Felts
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Herb Martin
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", verec
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Larry Clapp
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Herb Martin
    • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", verec
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Pascal Costanza
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", verec
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Pascal Costanza
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Wade Humeniuk
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Steven E. Harris
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Kenny Tilton
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Steven E. Harris
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Stefan Scholl
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Steven E. Harris
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", verec
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Wade Humeniuk
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Frank Buss
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Edi Weitz
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", John Thingstad
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Edi Weitz
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", John Thingstad
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Edi Weitz
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", John Thingstad
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", John Thingstad
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", John Thingstad
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Edi Weitz
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Wade Humeniuk
      • Free "Express Edition" of AllegroCL (was: LW "hobbyist pricing"), Edi Weitz
      • Re: Free "Express Edition" of AllegroCL, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Free "Express Edition" of AllegroCL (was: LW "hobbyist pricing"), Joe Marshall
      • Re: Free "Express Edition" of AllegroCL (was: LW "hobbyist pricing"), Arthur Lemmens
      • Re: Free "Express Edition" of AllegroCL (was: LW "hobbyist pricing"), Coby Beck
      • Re: Free "Express Edition" of AllegroCL (was: LW "hobbyist pricing"), Michael Price
      • Re: Free "Express Edition" of AllegroCL, M Jared Finder
      • Re: Free "Express Edition" of AllegroCL, Michael Price
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Tayssir John Gabbour
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Wade Humeniuk
  • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", André Thieme
    • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Jeff M.
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", justinhj
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Jeff M.
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Edi Weitz
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Bill Bradford
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Bill Bradford
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Bill Bradford
      • Message not available
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Peter Herth
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Tayssir John Gabbour
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Förster vom Silberwald
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", John Thingstad
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", verec
      • Message not available
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Peter Herth
      • Message not available
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", verec
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Michael Price
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Geoffrey Summerhayes
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Robert Uhl
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Robert Uhl
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Michael Price
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", John Thingstad
  • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Tayssir John Gabbour
    • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", verec
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Tayssir John Gabbour
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", verec
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Cameron MacKinnon
    • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Förster vom Silberwald
    • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Joe Marshall
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Tayssir John Gabbour
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", verec
      • Re: LW "hobbyist pricing", Ulrich Hobelmann
• Finally did it... goodbye vim, hello SLIME, Jonathon McKitrick
  • Re: Finally did it... goodbye vim, hello SLIME, nallen05
    • Re: Finally did it... goodbye vim, hello SLIME, William Bland
      • Re: Finally did it... goodbye vim, hello SLIME, Jonathon McKitrick
      • Re: Finally did it... goodbye vim, hello SLIME, David Douthitt
  • Re: Finally did it... goodbye vim, hello SLIME, David Douthitt
    • Re: Finally did it... goodbye vim, hello SLIME, Ulrich Hobelmann
  • Re: Finally did it... goodbye vim, hello SLIME, Tim X
    • Re: Finally did it... goodbye vim, hello SLIME, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Finally did it... goodbye vim, hello SLIME, Vasile Rotaru
      • Re: Finally did it... goodbye vim, hello SLIME, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Finally did it... goodbye vim, hello SLIME, Vasile Rotaru
      • Re: Finally did it... goodbye vim, hello SLIME, Taylor Campbell
    • Re: Finally did it... goodbye vim, hello SLIME, Julian Stecklina
• my=, verec
  • Re: my=, Pascal Bourguignon
    • Re: my=, verec
      • Re: my=, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: my=, verec
      • Re: my=, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: my=, Johan Bockgård
      • Re: my=, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: my=, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: my=, Thomas F. Burdick
  • Re: my=, Ron Garret
  • Re: my=, Frode Vatvedt Fjeld
    • Re: my=, verec
  • Re: my=, Don Geddis
    • Re: my=, verec
  • Re: my=, Sam Steingold
    • Re: my=, verec
• love that python, Jason Kantz
  • Re: love that python (CMUCL compiler), Juliusz Chroboczek
• About those parenthesis...., Joe Marshall
  • Re: About those parenthesis...., Kenny Tilton
  • Re: About those parenthesis...., verec
  • Re: About those parenthesis...., GP lisper
  • Re: About those parenthesis...., Jeff M.
    • Re: About those parenthesis...., Duane Rettig
    • Re: About those parenthesis...., Petter Gustad
    • Re: About those parenthesis...., Duncan Harvey
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Jeff M.
    • Re: About those parenthesis...., Joe Marshall
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Edi Weitz
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Eli Gottlieb
    • Re: About those parenthesis...., Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
    • Re: About those parenthesis...., Matthias Buelow
  • Re: About those parenthesis...., chris0123456789
  • Re: About those parenthesis...., Robert Dodier
    • Re: About those parenthesis...., Kenny Tilton
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., tichy
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., John Thingstad
    • Re: About those parenthesis...., Frank Buss
    • Re: About those parenthesis...., Rob Thorpe
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Robert Dodier
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Rob Thorpe
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Pascal Bourguignon
    • Re: About those parenthesis...., Thomas F. Burdick
    • Re: About those parenthesis...., Duane Rettig
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Kenny Tilton
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Duane Rettig
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Kenny Tilton
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., David Sletten
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Kenny Tilton
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., David Sletten
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Joe Marshall
  • Re: About those parenthesis...., Pascal Costanza
  • Re: About those parenthesis...., Fernando Rodríguez
  • Re: About those parenthesis...., Eli Gottlieb
    • Re: About those parenthesis...., Zach Beane
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Pascal Costanza
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Adrian Kubala
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Eli Gottlieb
      • Vim and Lisp (was About those parenthesis), Adrian Kubala
      • Re: Vim and Lisp (was About those parenthesis), Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Larry Clapp
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Aaron Brown
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., tichy
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., tichy
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Pascal Costanza
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Michael Wildpaner
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Pascal Costanza
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Michael Wildpaner
  • Re: About those parenthesis...., Majorinc , Kazimir
    • Re: About those parenthesis...., Pascal Costanza
      • Message not available
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Tayssir John Gabbour
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Pascal Costanza
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Jens Axel Søgaard
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., tichy
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Andreas Eder
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Espen Vestre
      • Message not available
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., tichy
      • Message not available
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., jayessay
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., jayessay
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., jayessay
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Vasile Rotaru
    • Re: About those parenthesis...., John Thingstad
    • Re: About those parenthesis...., Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Kaz Kylheku
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Rob Warnock
  • Re: About those parenthesis...., Paolo Amoroso
  • Re: About those parenthesis...., Ulrich Hobelmann
    • Re: About those parenthesis...., Pascal Costanza
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Ulrich Hobelmann
  • Re: About those parenthesis...., nallen05
  • Re: About those parenthesis...., Rob Warnock
    • Re: About those parenthesis...., Michael Livshin
    • Re: About those parenthesis...., Frank Goenninger DG1SBG
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Kenny Tilton
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Frank Goenninger DG1SBG
    • Re: About those parenthesis...., nallen05
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Raffael Cavallaro
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Rob Warnock
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Rob Warnock
      • Re: OPFR, nallen05
      • Re: OPFR, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: OPFR, nallen05
      • Re: OPFR, Rob Warnock
      • Re: OPFR, nallen05
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Joe Marshall
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., Robert Uhl
      • Re: About those parenthesis...., anamax
  • Re: About those parenthesis...., David Douthitt
• Re: NYC LOCAL: Tuesday 10 January 2006 Lisp NYC: Joe Corneli on the AI tool Arxana and the Hyperreal Dictionary of Mathematics, C Y
• Help with SBCL multiprocessing, RPG
  • Re: Help with SBCL multiprocessing, Thomas F. Burdick
    • Re: Help with SBCL multiprocessing, RPG
      • Re: Help with SBCL multiprocessing [conditionalization], RPG
      • Re: Help with SBCL multiprocessing [conditionalization], Juho Snellman
      • Re: Help with SBCL multiprocessing [conditionalization], RPG
      • Re: Help with SBCL multiprocessing [conditionalization], Juho Snellman
      • Re: Help with SBCL multiprocessing, Thomas F. Burdick
  • Re: Help with SBCL multiprocessing, mega
• newbie topic / patchwork - ircam, dvlfrnd
  • Re: newbie topic / patchwork - ircam, Frank Buss
    • Re: newbie topic / patchwork - ircam, Luke J Crook
  • Re: newbie topic / patchwork - ircam, joswig
• Newbie: utf-8 on slime/clisp win32, Markus Grueneis
  • Re: Newbie: utf-8 on slime/clisp win32, Sam Steingold
    • Re: Newbie: utf-8 on slime/clisp win32, Markus Grueneis
      • Re: Newbie: utf-8 on slime/clisp win32, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Newbie: utf-8 on slime/clisp win32, Markus Grueneis
      • Re: Newbie: utf-8 on slime/clisp win32, ogliomus
      • Re: Newbie: utf-8 on slime/clisp win32, Markus Grueneis
      • Re: Newbie: utf-8 on slime/clisp win32, ogliomus
      • Re: Newbie: utf-8 on slime/clisp win32, Markus Grueneis
      • Re: Newbie: utf-8 on slime/clisp win32, ogliomus
      • Re: Newbie: utf-8 on slime/clisp win32, Markus Grueneis
      • Re: Newbie: utf-8 on slime/clisp win32, Peter Seibel
      • Re: Newbie: utf-8 on slime/clisp win32, Markus Grueneis
• Is there a SICP video mirror site?, GB
  • Re: Is there a SICP video mirror site?, nallen05
  • Re: Is there a SICP video mirror site?, nallen05
    • Re: Is there a SICP video mirror site?, GB
• Why does it take a whole day for my post to appear in this group?, wildmind
  • Re: Why does it take a whole day for my post to appear in this group?, Rainer Joswig
  • Re: Why does it take a whole day for my post to appear in this group?, mmcconnell17704
  • Re: Why does it take a whole day for my post to appear in this group?, Barry Margolin
• Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, Kenny Tilton
  • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, Creighton Hogg
    • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, Sylvain
  • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, Markus Grueneis
  • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, nallen05
    • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, nallen05
  • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, micromoog
    • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, joswig
      • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, micromoog
  • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, Giorgos Keramidas
  • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, Eli Gottlieb
  • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, John Thingstad
  • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, GP lisper
    • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, GP lisper
    • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, GP lisper
      • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, Rob Warnock
      • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, Edi Weitz
      • low-level hacking [was Re: Calling All Noobs... ], Rob Warnock
      • Re: low-level hacking, Edi Weitz
      • Re: low-level hacking [was Re: Calling All Noobs... ], John Thingstad
      • Re: low-level hacking, Edi Weitz
      • Re: low-level hacking, John Thingstad
      • Re: low-level hacking [was Re: Calling All Noobs... ], Rob Warnock
      • Re: low-level hacking [was Re: Calling All Noobs... ], Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: low-level hacking, Ivan Boldyrev
      • Re: low-level hacking, Rob Warnock
      • Re: low-level hacking, Ivan Boldyrev
      • Re: low-level hacking, Rob Warnock
      • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, James Bielman
      • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, Rob Warnock
      • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, James Bielman
      • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, John Thingstad
  • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, Will McCutchen
    • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, Eli Gottlieb
  • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, Philippe Lorin
  • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, Giorgos Pontikakis
  • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, Kenny Tilton
    • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, Ties Stuij
    • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, Peter Seibel
  • Re: Calling All Noobs: Mini RtL Survey, Robert Uhl
• How to bid on Lisp project (again, and for real this time), Jonathon McKitrick
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • How to bid on Lisp project (again, and for real this time), Jonathon McKitrick
    • Re: How to bid on Lisp project (again, and for real this time), Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: How to bid on Lisp project (again, and for real this time), Jonathon McKitrick
      • Re: How to bid on Lisp project (again, and for real this time), Peder O. Klingenberg
      • Re: How to bid on Lisp project (again, and for real this time), Jonathon McKitrick
      • Re: How to bid on Lisp project (again, and for real this time), Peder O. Klingenberg
      • Re: How to bid on Lisp project (again, and for real this time), Pascal Bourguignon
  • How to bid on Lisp project (again, and for real this time), Jonathon McKitrick
    • [OT] Duplicate usenet posts, Ulrich Hobelmann
• Compiling a file with a package included, OMouse
  • Re: Compiling a file with a package included, Rainer Joswig
    • Re: Compiling a file with a package included, OMouse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Compiling a file with a package included, OMouse
  • Compiling a file with a package included, OMouse
  • Compiling a file with a package included, OMouse
  • Compiling a file with a package included, OMouse
• macroexpand in cmucl, Giorgos Pontikakis
  • Re: macroexpand in cmucl, Christophe Rhodes
  • Re: macroexpand in cmucl, Jens Axel Søgaard
    • Re: macroexpand in cmucl, Giorgos Pontikakis
      • Re: macroexpand in cmucl, Raymond Toy
      • Re: macroexpand in cmucl, Rob Warnock
      • Re: macroexpand in cmucl, Raymond Toy
      • Re: macroexpand in cmucl, Rob Warnock
      • Re: macroexpand in cmucl, Raymond Toy
    • Re: macroexpand in cmucl, Giorgos Pontikakis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • macroexpand in cmucl, Giorgos Pontikakis
• Strings, WoodHacker
  • Re: Strings, Edi Weitz
  • Re: Strings, nallen05
  • Re: Strings, Thomas A. Russ
    • Re: Strings, WoodHacker
      • Re: Strings, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Strings, Thomas A. Russ
• Re: passing parameter by reference, Ivan Boldyrev
  • Re: passing parameter by reference, Kenny Tilton
• List question, G
  • Re: List question, Frank Buss
    • Re: List question, Rainer Joswig
      • Re: List question, G
  • Re: List question, Pascal Bourguignon
  • Re: List question, John Thingstad
• Clisp implementation questions, Wout Perquin
  • Re: Clisp implementation questions, Sam Steingold
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Clisp implementation questions, Wout Perquin
• Compiling + Packages, OMouse
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Compiling + Packages, OMouse
    • Re: Compiling + Packages, tichy
• Try to understand the clisp implementation, Wout Perquin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Try to understand the clisp implementation, Wout Perquin
  • Try to understand the clisp implementation, Wout Perquin
• Some kind of stuck (newbie questions), Wout Perquin
• Some kind of stuck, Wout Perquin
  • Re: Some kind of stuck, Pascal Bourguignon
• New CL Directory version and already more than 100 items!, Marc Battyani
• Donations for common-lisp.net, Edi Weitz
  • Re: Donations for common-lisp.net, Erik Enge
• Lisp, Scheme or Smalltalk, wildmind
  • Re: Lisp, Scheme or Smalltalk, Stefan Nobis
  • Re: Lisp, Scheme or Smalltalk, Bruce Hoult
  • Re: Lisp, Scheme or Smalltalk, Kenny Tilton
  • Re: Lisp, Scheme or Smalltalk, Pascal Costanza
  • Re: Lisp, Scheme or Smalltalk, Ulrich Hobelmann
  • Re: Lisp, Scheme or Smalltalk, olczyk
    • Re: Lisp, Scheme or Smalltalk, Thomas F. Burdick
  • Re: Lisp, Scheme or Smalltalk, Gareth McCaughan
    • Re: Lisp, Scheme or Smalltalk, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Lisp, Scheme or Smalltalk, Gareth McCaughan
    • Re: Lisp, Scheme or Smalltalk, Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: Lisp, Scheme or Smalltalk, Pascal Costanza
  • Re: Lisp, Scheme or Smalltalk, Joe Marshall
    • Re: Lisp, Scheme or Smalltalk, Panos C. Lekkas
  • Re: Lisp, Scheme or Smalltalk, klaus momberger
• Why the 'deleting unreachable code' message here?, Jonathon McKitrick
  • Re: Why the 'deleting unreachable code' message here?, Barry Margolin
• Need help interpreting this, Kenny Tilton
  • Re: Need help interpreting this, Sean Sieger
    • Re: Need help interpreting this, Kenny Tilton
    • Re: Need help interpreting this, Joe Marshall
      • Re: Need help interpreting this, John Thingstad
      • Re: Need help interpreting this, Joe Marshall
      • Re: Need help interpreting this, drewc
  • Re: Need help interpreting this, Eli Gottlieb
  • Re: Need help interpreting this, Charles Richmond
    • Re: Need help interpreting this, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Need help interpreting this, Geoffrey Summerhayes
  • Re: Need help interpreting this, Thomas F. Burdick
    • Re: Need help interpreting this, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Need help interpreting this, Thomas F. Burdick
  • Re: Need help interpreting this, Tim X
• Can't figure out unreachable code error, Jonathon McKitrick
  • Re: Can't figure out unreachable code error, Rob Warnock
    • Re: Can't figure out unreachable code error, Jonathon McKitrick
    • Re: Can't figure out unreachable code error, Jonathon McKitrick
    • Re: Can't figure out unreachable code error, Jonathon McKitrick
    • Re: Can't figure out unreachable code error, Jonathon McKitrick
    • Re: Can't figure out unreachable code error, Jonathon McKitrick
• Newbie question about quote, wildmind
  • Re: Newbie question about quote, Johan Toki Persson
  • Re: Newbie question about quote, Barry Margolin
  • Re: Newbie question about quote, John Thingstad
    • Re: Newbie question about quote, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Newbie question about quote, John Thingstad
      • Re: Newbie question about quote, Barry Margolin
      • Re: Newbie question about quote, John Thingstad
      • Re: Newbie question about quote, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Newbie question about quote, John Thingstad
      • Re: Newbie question about quote, John Thingstad
  • Re: Newbie question about quote, LuisGLopez
  • Re: Newbie question about quote, netytan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • newbie question about quote, wildmind
    • Re: newbie question about quote, Stefan Nobis
    • Re: newbie question about quote, Kenny Tilton
    • Re: newbie question about quote, GB
    • Re: newbie question about quote, Tayssir John Gabbour
    • Re: newbie question about quote, Wade Humeniuk
    • Re: newbie question about quote, Joe Marshall
• Understanding CLOS Encapsulation, Waldo
  • Re: Understanding CLOS Encapsulation, Kenny Tilton
    • Re: Understanding CLOS Encapsulation, Waldo
      • Re: Understanding CLOS Encapsulation, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Understanding CLOS Encapsulation, Waldo
      • Re: Understanding CLOS Encapsulation, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Understanding CLOS Encapsulation, verec
      • Re: Understanding CLOS Encapsulation, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Understanding CLOS Encapsulation, Kenny Tilton
  • Re: Understanding CLOS Encapsulation, Jimka
  • Re: Understanding CLOS Encapsulation, Joe Marshall
• Why is this consing?!, Jason Kantz
  • Re: Why is this consing?!, Juho Snellman
    • Re: Why is this consing?!, John Thingstad
• Re: using setf with assoc, Jason Kantz
• Father Christmas: TI Explorer Lisp Machines to give away..., Rainer Joswig
  • Re: Father Christmas: TI Explorer Lisp Machines to give away..., BR
    • Re: Father Christmas: TI Explorer Lisp Machines to give away..., Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Father Christmas: TI Explorer Lisp Machines to give away..., Paolo Amoroso
• Lisp web app hosting, Jonathon McKitrick
  • Re: Lisp web app hosting, Rob Warnock
  • Re: Lisp web app hosting, Paolo Amoroso
  • Re: Lisp web app hosting, Thomas F. Burdick
  • Re: Lisp web app hosting, Babar K. Zafar
  • Re: Lisp web app hosting, codyk........@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Lisp web app hosting, John Thingstad
  • Re: Lisp web app hosting, codyk........@xxxxxxxxx
• HEUTE 1.0 released, Jimka
  • Re: HEUTE 1.0 released, Marc Battyani
• class-precedence-list, Jimka
  • Re: class-precedence-list, Pascal Costanza
  • Re: class-precedence-list, Edi Weitz
• package system .. severely broken?, Jimka
  • Re: package system .. severely broken?, Pascal Costanza
    • Re: package system .. severely broken?, Pascal Costanza
    • Re: package system .. severely broken?, Barry Margolin
      • Re: package system .. severely broken?, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: package system .. severely broken?, Thomas F. Burdick
• FS: (on Ebay) various Lisp publications, Mark
• Newbie Question: Part 2. uninstallilling with asdf-install, Carlos
  • Re: Newbie Question: Part 2. uninstallilling with asdf-install, Edi Weitz
    • Re: Newbie Question: Part 2. uninstallilling with asdf-install, Carlos
      • Re: Newbie Question: Part 2. uninstallilling with asdf-install, Edi Weitz
    • Re: Newbie Question: Part 2. uninstallilling with asdf-install, Carlos
• News: Finding Lisp on Blogspot's featured blogs list, Ron Garret
• Measuring Computational Efficiency, dpapathanasiou
  • Re: Measuring Computational Efficiency, Rainer Joswig
    • Re: Measuring Computational Efficiency, mmcconnell17704
  • Re: Measuring Computational Efficiency, Joe Marshall
• Re: Araneida won't listen, Denis Bueno
  • Re: Araneida won't listen, Zach Beane
• Re: Using lispworks with Slime, justinhj
• Araneida behind Apache vs mod_lisp, Sylvain
  • Re: Araneida behind Apache vs mod_lisp, Ulrich Hobelmann
  • Re: Araneida behind Apache vs mod_lisp, Thomas F. Burdick
• Bay Area Lispniks get together this Friday, Peter Seibel
• popold, verec
  • Re: popold, Edi Weitz
  • Re: popold, Pascal Bourguignon
  • Re: popold, Pascal Costanza
  • Re: popold, verec
    • Re: popold, Brian Downing
      • Re: popold, Brian Downing
    • Re: popold, Edi Weitz
    • Re: popold, Barry Margolin
• pprint hunh?, Kenny Tilton
  • Re: pprint hunh?, Brian Downing
    • Re: pprint hunh?, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: pprint hunh?, Brian Downing
      • Re: pprint hunh?, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: pprint hunh?, Gareth McCaughan
  • Re: pprint hunh?, Espen Vestre
  • Re: pprint hunh?, Paolo Amoroso
• Re: conciseness is power, Greg Bacon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: conciseness is power, Tayssir John Gabbour
    • Re: conciseness is power, Tayssir John Gabbour
• Re: Newbie trying to install araneida webserver, Alan Shields
• What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Majorinc , Kazimir
  • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, justinhj
  • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Geoffrey Summerhayes
    • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Adrian Kubala
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Adrian Kubala
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, André Thieme
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Geoffrey Summerhayes
    • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, John Thingstad
  • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Coby Beck
    • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Lars Brinkhoff
  • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Eli Gottlieb
    • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Rainer Joswig
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Bruce Hoult
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, mmcconnell17704
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Philippe Lorin
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Eli Gottlieb
  • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Joe Marshall
  • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Jeff M.
  • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Kenny Tilton
    • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Edi Weitz
    • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Philippe Lorin
    • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Michael
  • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Rob Warnock
    • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Ulrich Hobelmann
    • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Tiarnán Ó Corráin
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Rainer Joswig
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Tiarnán Ó Corráin
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Rainer Joswig
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Creighton Hogg
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Rainer Joswig
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Creighton Hogg
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Tiarnán Ó Corráin
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Tiarnán Ó Corráin
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Rainer Joswig
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Philippe Lorin
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Edi Weitz
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, André Thieme
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Rainer Joswig
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Giorgos Keramidas
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Giorgos Keramidas
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Thomas A. Russ
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, John Thingstad
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Coby Beck
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Timofei Shatrov
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Rainer Joswig
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, justinhj
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Rob Warnock
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Rainer Joswig
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Rob Warnock
    • Re: No Need for Macros (Was: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?), Alexander Burger
      • Re: No Need for Macros (Was: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?), Rob Warnock
      • Re: No Need for Macros (Was: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?), tichy
  • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Denis Bueno
    • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Majorinc , Kazimir
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Denis Bueno
  • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Frank Buss
    • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Rainer Joswig
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Frank Buss
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Rainer Joswig
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Frank Buss
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Rainer Joswig
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, John Thingstad
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Rainer Joswig
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, John Thingstad
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, André Thieme
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Pascal Costanza
    • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Jimka
      • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Thomas F. Burdick
    • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Joerg Hoehle
  • Re: What is the main advantage of macros over functions?, Tayssir John Gabbour
• Problem installing CLSQL on SBCL/Linux, Jonathon McKitrick
  • Re: Problem installing CLSQL on SBCL/Linux, Luigi Panzeri
• attribute blocks alignment, dorairamesh@xxxxxxxxx
• TEST- ignore, Raffael Cavallaro
  • Re: TEST- ignore, rsobriquet
• Lisp newbie:ASDF-INSTALL GPG woes, Carlos
  • Re: Lisp newbie:ASDF-INSTALL GPG woes, Paolo Amoroso
  • Re: Lisp newbie:ASDF-INSTALL GPG woes, Edi Weitz
    • Re: Lisp newbie:ASDF-INSTALL GPG woes, justinhj
      • Re: Lisp newbie:ASDF-INSTALL GPG woes, Edi Weitz
      • Re: Lisp newbie:ASDF-INSTALL GPG woes, justinhj
    • Re: Lisp newbie:ASDF-INSTALL GPG woes, Carlos
• is there a Python/Lisp AP?, levicc00123@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: is there a Python/Lisp AP?, Luke J Crook
    • Re: is there a Python/Lisp AP?, levicc00123@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: is there a Python/Lisp AP?, Lars Rune Nøstdal
    • Re: is there a Python/Lisp AP?, levicc00123@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: is there a Python/Lisp AP?, John Thingstad
      • Re: is there a Python/Lisp AP?, John Thingstad
      • Re: is there a Python/Lisp AP?, Marco Antoniotti
    • Re: is there a Python/Lisp AP?, levicc00123@xxxxxxxxx
• [cells-gtk-devel] Announcement: cells-gtk using CFFI, and CLISP is back in!, Kenny Tilton
  • Re: [cells-gtk-devel] Announcement: cells-gtk using CFFI, and CLISP is back in!, Revzala Haelmic
    • Re: [cells-gtk-devel] Announcement: cells-gtk using CFFI, and CLISP is back in!, Kenny Tilton
• <progv> question, Carl Taylor
  • Re: <progv> question, Pascal Costanza
    • Re: <progv> question, Carl Taylor
      • Re: <progv> question, Edi Weitz
      • Re: <progv> question, Carl Taylor
      • Re: <progv> question, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: <progv> question, Barry Margolin
      • Re: <progv> question, Thomas A. Russ
  • Re: <progv> question, josephoswaldgg@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: <progv> question, Edi Weitz
    • Re: <progv> question, Steven M. Haflich
• compiling clisp, Jimka
  • Re: compiling clisp, Pascal Bourguignon
• Lisp versus Python or PHP for a web app, Jonathon McKitrick
  • Re: Lisp versus Python or PHP for a web app, Rob Warnock
    • Re: Lisp versus Python or PHP for a web app, Jonathon McKitrick
    • Re: Lisp versus Python or PHP for a web app, Tim Johnson
      • Re: Lisp versus Python or PHP for a web app, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Lisp versus Python or PHP for a web app, David Golden
      • Re: Lisp versus Python or PHP for a web app, Marc Battyani
      • Re: Lisp versus Python or PHP for a web app, Jonathon McKitrick
      • Re: Lisp versus Python or PHP for a web app, Tim Johnson
• The Common Lisp Directory now has RSS feeds, Marc Battyani
• Text console, Timofei Shatrov
  • Re: Text console, Sam Steingold
    • Re: Text console, Timofei Shatrov
      • Re: Text console, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Text console, yello62
      • Re: Text console, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Text console, John Thingstad
      • Re: Text console, Thomas Dickey
      • Re: Text console, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
      • Re: Text console, yello62
  • Re: Text console, Steven M. Haflich
    • Re: Text console, John Thingstad
      • Re: Text console, Espen Vestre
    • Re: Text console, yello62
      • Re: Text console, Espen Vestre
    • Re: Text console, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
      • Re: Text console, Ivan Boldyrev
• Comments are enabled again on the Common Lisp Directory., Marc Battyani
• Re: Python and Lisp Test, Jon Harrop
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Python and Lisp Test, Jon Harrop
  • Re: Python and Lisp Test, Jon Harrop
  • Re: Python and Lisp Test, Rob Thorpe
    • Re: Python and Lisp Test, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Python and Lisp Test, Rob Thorpe
      • Re: Python and Lisp Test, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Python and Lisp Test, Rob Thorpe
      • Re: Python and Lisp Test, Marco Antoniotti
      • Re: Python and Lisp Test, Christophe Rhodes
      • Re: Python and Lisp Test, Marco Antoniotti
      • Re: Python and Lisp Test, Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: Python and Lisp Test, anamax
  • Re: Python and Lisp Test, Lars Brinkhoff
    • Re: Python and Lisp Test, Marcin 'Qrczak' Kowalczyk
      • Re: Python and Lisp Test, Lars Brinkhoff
• [Q] Type declaration mysteries with CMU CL, Didier Verna
  • Re: [Q] Type declaration mysteries with CMU CL, Raymond Toy
    • Re: [Q] Type declaration mysteries with CMU CL, Didier Verna
  • Re: [Q] Type declaration mysteries with CMU CL, Thomas A. Russ
• Re: Verrazano/CFFI R.I.P.?, Petter Gustad
• Re: LWW recursive stack overflows - Lisp Cookbook Using Win32 API code, Edi Weitz
• Re: something i don't understand..., Lars Brinkhoff
  • Re: something i don't understand..., Karl A. Krueger
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: something i don't understand..., Geoffrey Summerhayes
    • Re: something i don't understand..., Kenny Tilton
  • Re: something i don't understand..., Fred Gilham
• Request for comments: WITH-DETACHED-BINDINGS, Tobias C. Rittweiler
• Web-based dictionary in Lisp, William Bland
  • Re: Web-based dictionary in Lisp, justinhj
• Future of Lisp, justinhj
  • Re: Future of Lisp, Marco Antoniotti
    • Re: Future of Lisp, justinhj
      • Re: Future of Lisp, nallen05
      • Re: Future of Lisp, justinhj
      • Re: Future of Lisp, nallen05
      • Re: Future of Lisp, justinhj
      • Re: Future of Lisp, Ulrich Hobelmann
  • Re: Future of Lisp, lin8080
    • Re: Future of Lisp, Joe Marshall
      • Re: Future of Lisp, lin8080
  • Re: Future of Lisp, nallen05
    • Re: Future of Lisp, justinhj
  • Re: Future of Lisp, Tim X
    • Re: Future of Lisp, justinhj
• [Announce] The Common Lisp Directory is online, Marc Battyani
  • Re: [Announce] The Common Lisp Directory is online, Valentino Volonghi aka Dialtone
    • Re: [Announce] The Common Lisp Directory is online, Marc Battyani
      • Re: The Common Lisp Directory is online, Jerry Boetje
      • Re: The Common Lisp Directory is online, Marc Battyani
      • Re: The Common Lisp Directory is online, Harald Hanche-Olsen
      • Re: The Common Lisp Directory is online, Marc Battyani
      • Re: The Common Lisp Directory is online, Bob Felts
      • Re: The Common Lisp Directory is online, Valentino Volonghi aka Dialtone
• GNU CLISP 2.37 (2006-01-02), Sam Steingold
• A lisp newbie example app., Asbjørn Bjørnstad
  • Re: A lisp newbie example app., Kenny Tilton
  • Re: A lisp newbie example app., ogliomus
  • Re: A lisp newbie example app., Brian Downing
    • Re: A lisp newbie example app., Asbjørn Bjørnstad
      • Re: A lisp newbie example app., Fred Bayer
      • Re: A lisp newbie example app., Asbjørn Bjørnstad
      • Re: A lisp newbie example app., Asbjørn Bjørnstad
  • Re: A lisp newbie example app., nallen05
• Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Pascal Bourguignon
  • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Eli Gottlieb
    • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Bob Felts
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Bob Felts
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, John Thingstad
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, John Thingstad
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, John Thingstad
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Geoffrey Summerhayes
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Geoffrey Summerhayes
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Geoffrey Summerhayes
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Zach Beane
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Raffael Cavallaro
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Eli Gottlieb
    • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Robert Uhl
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Robert Uhl
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Eli Gottlieb
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, verec
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, verec
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Robert Uhl
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Can I write a better OS than Windows XP in Lisp ???, Robert Uhl
• Re: Destructive Functions, Lars Brinkhoff
• Re: Windows.h with Verrazano, Frank Buss
  • Re: Windows.h with Verrazano, Surendra Singhi
    • Re: Windows.h with Verrazano, Frank Buss
    • Re: Windows.h with Verrazano, Kenny Tilton
  • Re: Windows.h with Verrazano, Kenny Tilton
    • Re: Windows.h with Verrazano, Frank Buss
      • Re: Windows.h with Verrazano, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Windows.h with Verrazano, Frank Buss
      • Re: Windows.h with Verrazano, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: Windows.h with Verrazano, Frank Buss
      • Re: Windows.h with Verrazano, John Thingstad
• Recursion in Macros, Ulrich Hobelmann
  • Re: Recursion in Macros, Bruce Hoult
  • Re: Recursion in Macros, Barry Margolin
    • Re: Recursion in Macros, Ulrich Hobelmann
      • Re: Recursion in Macros, Coby Beck
      • Re: Recursion in Macros, Ulrich Hobelmann
• CELLS-GTK on OS X with CAIRO anyone?, Frank Goenninger DG1SBG
  • Re: CELLS-GTK on OS X with CAIRO anyone?, Peter Denno
    • Re: CELLS-GTK on OS X with CAIRO anyone?, Frank Goenninger DG1SBG
  • Re: CELLS-GTK on OS X with CAIRO anyone?, Andras Simon
    • Re: CELLS-GTK on OS X with CAIRO anyone?, Frank Goenninger DG1SBG
• Lisp newbie, data structures, parsing., Liam Clarke
  • Re: Lisp newbie, data structures, parsing., Cameron MacKinnon
  • Re: Lisp newbie, data structures, parsing., JP Massar
    • Re: Lisp newbie, data structures, parsing., Liam Clarke
      • Re: Lisp newbie, data structures, parsing., Rob Warnock
  • Re: Lisp newbie, data structures, parsing., Brian Downing
    • Re: Lisp newbie, data structures, parsing., Liam Clarke
      • Re: Lisp newbie, data structures, parsing., Russell McManus
  • Re: Lisp newbie, data structures, parsing., Pascal Bourguignon
    • Re: Lisp newbie, data structures, parsing., Stefan Kamphausen
      • Re: Lisp newbie, data structures, parsing., Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: Lisp newbie, data structures, parsing., Rob Warnock
  • Re: Lisp newbie, data structures, parsing., John
    • Re: Lisp newbie, data structures, parsing., John
    • Re: Lisp newbie, data structures, parsing., Liam Clarke
      • Re: Lisp newbie, data structures, parsing., Liam Clarke
      • Re: Lisp newbie, data structures, parsing., Rob Warnock
• Data as Code; help a newbie for New Years!, GP lisper
  • Re: Data as Code; help a newbie for New Years!, Carl Taylor
    • Re: Data as Code; help a newbie for New Years!, GP lisper
• Re: "telent clx", "portable CLX", and the various Lisps, GP lisper
  • Re: "telent clx", "portable CLX", and the various Lisps, Raymond Toy
• cosx - sinx + 3x2, uhpvl34
  • Re: cosx - sinx + 3x2, Harald Hanche-Olsen
  • Re: cosx - sinx + 3x2, John
  • Re: cosx - sinx + 3x2, GB
    • Re: cosx - sinx + 3x2, Marco Antoniotti
• Why no compiler-macrolet?, Pascal Costanza
  • Re: Why no compiler-macrolet?, Joerg Hoehle
    • Re: Why no compiler-macrolet?, Pascal Costanza
  • Re: Why no compiler-macrolet?, Kaz Kylheku
    • Re: Why no compiler-macrolet?, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Why no compiler-macrolet?, Duane Rettig
      • Re: Why no compiler-macrolet?, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Why no compiler-macrolet?, Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: Why no compiler-macrolet?, Duane Rettig
      • Re: Why no compiler-macrolet?, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Why no compiler-macrolet?, Steven M. Haflich
      • Re: Why no compiler-macrolet?, Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: Why no compiler-macrolet?, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Why no compiler-macrolet?, Thomas F. Burdick
      • Re: Why no compiler-macrolet?, Duane Rettig
      • Re: Why no compiler-macrolet?, Pascal Costanza
      • Re: Why no compiler-macrolet?, Christophe Rhodes
      • Re: Why no compiler-macrolet?, Duane Rettig
      • Re: Why no compiler-macrolet?, Duane Rettig
      • C-like Unions in Lisp (was Re: Why no compiler-macrolet?), Cameron MacKinnon
      • Re: C-like Unions in Lisp (was Re: Why no compiler-macrolet?), Duane Rettig
      • Re: C-like Unions in Lisp (was Re: Why no compiler-macrolet?), Juho Snellman
      • Re: C-like Unions in Lisp (was Re: Why no compiler-macrolet?), Duane Rettig
      • Re: Why no compiler-macrolet?, Joerg Hoehle
      • Re: Why no compiler-macrolet?, Kaz Kylheku
• Call For Papers: ISMM 2006 (International Symposium on Memory Management), erez_acount
• Help with comparing lists., netytan
  • Re: Help with comparing lists., Pascal Bourguignon
  • Re: Help with comparing lists., Timofei Shatrov
    • Re: Help with comparing lists., Frank Buss
      • Re: Help with comparing lists., Timofei Shatrov
      • Re: Help with comparing lists., netytan
      • Re: Help with comparing lists., Gareth McCaughan
  • Re: Help with comparing lists., Pascal Bourguignon
• localized plurals using format?, Per Bothner
• Re: Returning to top-level on error, Steven M. Haflich
• Re: Trade-off, option, choice., sampo . vuori
  • Re: Trade-off, option, choice., verec
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Trade-off, option, choice., Carl Taylor
    • Re: Trade-off, option, choice., verec
      • Re: Trade-off, option, choice., Carl Taylor
  • Re: Trade-off, option, choice., Damien Diederen
    • Re: Trade-off, option, choice., verec
      • Re: Trade-off, option, choice., Damien Diederen
• Re: newbie question, OMouse
  • Re: newbie question, airfoyle
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: newbie question, nallen05
  • Re: newbie question, dvlfrnd
    • Re: newbie question, Timofei Shatrov
  • Re: newbie question, Eli Gottlieb
    • Re: newbie question, Eli Gottlieb
    • Re: newbie question, Coby Beck
      • Re: newbie question, Eli Gottlieb
  • Re: newbie question, David Sletten
    • Re: newbie question, Coby Beck
      • Re: newbie question, Joerg Hoehle
      • Re: newbie question, Lars Brinkhoff
    • Re: newbie question, Brian Downing
  • Re: newbie question, Pascal Bourguignon
  • Re: newbie question, John
    • Re: newbie question, John
      • Re: newbie question, airfoyle
      • Re: newbie question, John
  • Re: newbie question, Ivan Boldyrev
    • Re: newbie question, Fred Gilham
  • Re: newbie question, Kenny Tilton
    • Re: newbie question, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: newbie question, Coby Beck
      • Re: newbie question, Kenny Tilton
      • Re: newbie question, Coby Beck
      • Re: newbie question, Pascal Bourguignon
      • Re: newbie question, Coby Beck
  • Re: newbie question, tichy
  • Re: newbie question, tichy
  • Re: newbie question, Giorgos Keramidas
    • Re: newbie question, Zach Beane
      • Re: newbie question, Giorgos Keramidas
  • Re: newbie question, André Thieme
    • Re: newbie question, dvlfrnd
      • Re: newbie question, David Sletten
      • Re: newbie question, dvlfrnd
    • Re: newbie question, Thomas A. Russ
      • Re: newbie question, André Thieme