Re: Open Letter to Peter Seibel [was Re: Lisp and software architecture]
- From: Ken Tilton <kentilton@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:32:11 -0500
Peter Seibel wrote:
Ken Tilton <kentilton@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
bradb wrote:
At least if nothing else good comes of all this, the cells-basic
tutorial is now up to date :) <ducks>
<heh-heh> No need to duck, I was laughing about that already. The
only downside is if I decide screw you guys, I'm going home.
The larger point is that it really is a two-way street. You raised
an issue with the doc and it got fixed. Coincidence? I don't think
so. :)
Doc whiners who never ask the maintainers anything remind me of this
story:
Hey, I didn't whine about the doc; I don't care one way or the other.
I just explaind why it was thta I never bothered to look deeply into
Cells, in response to your claim that it was because I was unable to
get it running.
Stop bobbing and weaving. :) Your response was as you say, explaining that you could not find anything explaining what it was and why you should bother. That explanation is what I am addressing. And I cannot believe you did not explain how what I posted did not address both what Cells is and why you should bother.
I'm glad to see that you're still working on it and on
the examples and so forth so if I even feel inclined to check it...
<sigh> Wait, I have an idea....
ken
--
Cells: http://common-lisp.net/project/cells/
"And I will know my song well before I start singing." - Bob Dylan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Open Letter to Peter Seibel
- From: Peter Seibel
- Re: Open Letter to Peter Seibel
- References:
- Lisp and software architecture
- From: Peter Seibel
- Re: Lisp and software architecture
- From: Pascal Costanza
- Re: Lisp and software architecture
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: Lisp and software architecture
- From: Peter Seibel
- Open Letter to Peter Seibel [was Re: Lisp and software architecture]
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: Open Letter to Peter Seibel [was Re: Lisp and software architecture]
- From: bradb
- Re: Open Letter to Peter Seibel [was Re: Lisp and software architecture]
- From: Ken Tilton
- Re: Open Letter to Peter Seibel [was Re: Lisp and software architecture]
- From: Peter Seibel
- Lisp and software architecture
- Prev by Date: Re: Open Letter to Peter Seibel [was Re: Lisp and software architecture]
- Next by Date: Re: Here I go again: listener or observer?
- Previous by thread: Re: Open Letter to Peter Seibel [was Re: Lisp and software architecture]
- Next by thread: Re: Open Letter to Peter Seibel
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|